• CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Hi I’m a fucking idiot, how can you beat cancer if there is no cure for it yet?

    I thought there was a cure but I guess not a very good one since some people don’t make it

    Edit: Thank you for the answers, that really cleared it up for me, and I understand cancer a bit better now.

    • Bolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      A “cure” in this situation means an essentially guaranteed method of treatment. Cancers vary greatly, with some being benign, some being very treatable, and some being extremely deadly (at least with current technology).

      • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Indeed. Beat it, but at what cost.

        My mum beat cancer. She lost parts of her body in the process and chemo changed her physically (her hair and nails never came back the same). It took three years of regular testing to finally be given the “you’re officially cancer free” verdict. Three tense years.

        All that said she’s incredibly lucky not only to have beat it but not to have to live with additional medication due to it. I know somebody who lost a lot more and while is alive now needs a lifetime of medication to “put in” what the partial removed organs no longer produce.

    • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      There are some treatments for some cancers with varying success rates. A cure would be a treatment for all cancers that always works.