

Happy Tree Friends was broadcasted in Australia once. Once.


Happy Tree Friends was broadcasted in Australia once. Once.
What’s even stupider is any billionaire doesn’t even have a billion in liquid capital, the vast majority of their networth is in shares from the companies they own and it’s in their interest to not dump a bunch of stock.


When you use LLMs to regurgitate code, you do not get ownership of the code as you did not produce it. so using llms to “launder” code doesn’t accomplish anything.


Why are you using the future tense when AI companies have already scraped the ever living crap out of every git forge it can access?


Zebraheads cover of Girlfriend by Avril Lavigne.


Supervised use with Adguard Home blocking as much as possible.


Not sure what corporate hellscape you live in but that is not how it works at all.
If you left it as a public git repo you just have to point to the commits in your repo as existing before their product and the case falls flat.


I prefer to always see both numbers.


You think regurgitation machine prone to hallucinations is intelligent?
Oh, it’s you. Of cause this turned into a hero rant. You really need better hobbies @Grimreaper@sopuli.xyz
Too bad it was the wrong kind of Sin.


Much like your Edge question.
Only use it for the bear minimum and Lemmy for everything else.


So late 90s early 2000 SMS speak?
By being happy and posting about it on Saturday.
Trust is for you to establish, check with your state BAR association for which kind of lawyer you should engage.
Talk to a lawyer about it. Do not take advice about legal matters from internet strangers.


Not a clue. Building managers are an odd bunch.


Tl;dr One building manager lied through his teeth to what we assume was to everyone about everything even on affidavits. Cost him his job, the company he worked for the building contract, several thousand dollars in federal court fees for the building owners, plus whatever their lawyers were charging.
Long story time
Working for an internet provider we had to inspect a building, we send a letter saying we are inspecting, here are the federal law references.
Lie 1: the building manager said they never received the letter despite his signature being on the proof of delivery.
We resend the letter but also send it to the buildings lawyers. We get a letter back from the lawyers saying no worries, go ahead they have told the building manager to expect us. We go back to the building.
Lie 1; round 2: They never received the second letter despite his signature being on the proof of delivery again.
Lie 2: Those lawyers were not the buildings lawyers so he won’t be letting us do the inspection.
We take the building to federal court for not following the law and the buildings lawyers present an affidavit from the building manager.
Lie 3: His affidavit said we never showed up on either date. even said he got the message from the lawyers saying to allow us.
Lawyer things happened and the federal judge sides with us, we proved we did what we needed and issues an order for us to do our work. We send the inspection notice for the third time with the judge’s decision. Building lawyers reply with the OK. We get to the building…
Lie 1; round 3: building manager said no letter was received. Lie 4: the judges order is invalid because the order came from a Brisbane court not a Canberra court. (Like the location of the federal court matters)
Back to the courts we go. Affidavit from the building manager. No shock.
Lie 3; round 2: yes he received the instruction from the lawyers to allow us but we never shows up.
Everyone is annoyed. Someone recommends at some point for their lawyer to come with us to an inspection. New date planed, letters sent all around. We get to the building and show the buildings lawyers the building log saying we were there on all previous dates.
We get to the building manager and again.
Lie 1; round 4: no letter received, not the buildings lawyers.
Lie 4; round 2: invalid judge order.
Special twist.
Lie 3; Uno reverse: says not sure why we come to the building so much and who the fresh face was.
Understandably the building lawyer is unhappy. Dude lost his job, building management company lost the contract, and building owners are on the hook for the court costs.


A breakdown in society as people report it as hoaxes, missinformation spreading everywhere, religious groups fragmenting over if they prove or disprove their gods existence. The same bullshit whenever world shaking event happens.


Technically doesn’t uranium boil one vessel of water, to then boil another vessel via a heat exchanger before turning the turbine?
So it takes 3 rounds to boil water for a cuppa?
Impossible, as the structure of language is not the same so you will always have lag or you need context to get the right meaning of a word. If someone is going to a ball, are they going to a dance, or getting a toy off the ground?