• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Nobody is forcing him to be a member of the profession – to paraphrase one of his tweets that was complained about “You’re free to leave [the profession] at any point.”

    Jordan Peterson really is free to leave the profession - he doesn’t need the money. Meanwhile a psychologist who isn’t independently wealthy can’t express controversial opinions without risking his livelihood. I don’t think “only the rich can exercise freedom of speech” is good policy.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      And again people don’t grok what “freedom of speech” entails.

      You can speak all you like. If what you say pisses people off, they can avoid you all they like, up to and including MOTHERFUCKING EMPLOYMENT.

      Freeze Peach idiots need to grow the Hell up!

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        People forget that free speech also includes freedom of association. You can say what you want but others have the freedom to choose not to associate with you because of it.

    • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Meanwhile a psychologist who isn’t independently wealthy can’t express controversial opinions without risking his livelihood

      Oh fuck off with that. The opinion he expressed was, and I quote, (about child deaths) “it’s just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyways”. A licensed medical professional should never say something like that, period, even in jest.

      • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Copy and paste of another user’s comment:

        Good article?

        The comments that formed the basis of the complaints against Dr. Peterson included comments on a podcast in which he commented on air pollution and child deaths by saying “it’s just poor children…”

        This quote is the most disgusting out of context character assassination I’ve seen in a long time.

        I got suspicious because while Jordan does say things that women and/or trans people often find deplorable. I know that he’s a strong supporter of the poor (at least in rhetoric) and as a family man I assume of children as well.

        The full context can be found on Spotify. Episode #1769 of “The Joe Rogan Experience” start from about 15:30. He’s the one that brings up how 7 million poor children die from indoor particulate pollution. Joe doesn’t believe him and gets a fact check, which eventually leads to Jordan sarcastically saying “Well, it’s just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyway…”

        It’s such an insane mischaracterization of what he said, you can’t take the article seriously. Probably would have to write off the entire website that article is from, honestly.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        I don’t know the context for that quote and I don’t think it’s particularly relevant to my argument. Even if we assume the worst possible interpretation, H.L. Mencken still said it best:

        The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one’s time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all.

        • escapesamsara@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          You’re right, that’s why I support genocide. There are too many oppressive laws aimed at oppressing the rights of fascists, or as I’ve taken to calling them, people with genocidal thoughts they’d like to turn into actions. You can’t start oppressing them, otherwise someone could use those laws to oppress me!

    • Dienervent@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      Good article?

      The comments that formed the basis of the complaints against Dr. Peterson included comments on a podcast in which he commented on air pollution and child deaths by saying “it’s just poor children…”

      This quote is the most disgusting out of context character assassination I’ve seen in a long time.

      I got suspicious because while Jordan does say things that women and/or trans people often find deplorable. I know that he’s a strong supporter of the poor (at least in rhetoric) and as a family man I assume of children as well.

      The full context can be found on Spotify. Episode #1769 of “The Joe Rogan Experience” start from about 15:30. He’s the one that brings up how 7 million poor children die from indoor particulate pollution. Joe doesn’t believe him and gets a fact check, which eventually leads to Jordan sarcastically saying “Well, it’s just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyway…”

      It’s such an insane mischaracterization of what he said, you can’t take the article seriously. Probably would have to write off the entire website that article is from, honestly.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    It pained me to discover that my brother liked one of his books in 2020. I’m very careful to not stress our relationship because he’s otherwise a decent person. I shudder to think what other content he might expose himself to over time and what that will mean for our relationship.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        He brought up men’s rights bullshit around the same time (actually, maybe a bit earlier). I shot that down in the most diplomatic terms I could. He seemed not to resist (I think I made my point fairly well and he reconsidered). He’s a good father and a caring brother. That’s enough for me.

    • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      I read one of his books before i knew who he was, and found although the advice was mostly common sense (if a bit context free) advice, followed by long rants about traditional family’s, and backed up by bible. I found myself thinking “what about behaviourism research?”, you know there has been progress in the last 100 years. I’m ashamed that the traditional family shit didn’t tip me off.

      I’ve found him come up in my google feeds often too, It’s insidious.

      In terms of convincing your brother about how off this guy is, generally there are how to approach things on line (i.e. you can’t always take a logical approach). I’ve also encountered this kind of thing in my extended family, I’ve got distant aunts that likely voted for trump, and they are otherwise decent people (i.e. not racist, and supportive).

      • Jayb151@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s a wild statement to insinuate that your family voting for Trump somehow makes them bad people. Likewise, Peterson has some decent advice that I think should not fully be written off due to his personal life.

        I haven’t really seen anyone in this thread disqualify his argument based on merits and only using their own feelings to say he’s wrong.

        In all honesty, I don’t have a horse in this race, but I don’t think Peterson is a terrible as everyone seems to think. Maybe I’m crazy

  • Aux@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Freedom of speech IS a freedom from consequences. Sadly most people using freedom of speech term today don’t understand that it doesn’t apply to the context of the discussion. The whole article is just complete nonsense.

    • grte@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      The idea that you can say reprehensible things then have your rights violated because others don’t want to associate with you anymore is the complete nonsense. Further, Canada doesn’t go by ‘freedom of speech’, it goes by freedom of expression.

        • grte@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 years ago

          No, I very much do. You don’t seem to understand the laws of the country involved, though.

            • grte@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 years ago

              That principle being, in your opinion, “I can say whatever I want and you have to associate with me?” I suggest you do some more studying.

              Also, freedom of speech doesn’t exist in Canadian law, so I guess not.

              • Aux@lemmy.worldBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                What are you even talking about? Once again, you just don’t understand freedom of speech. Just like most people.

  • Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    If we all followed the teachings of jordan peterson we would be living in a world perfectly suited to jordan peterson. I would sooner live in a world which made jordan peterson suicidal.