- He’s full of shit 
- Ring doorbell is watching you. 
- Countries with extensive cctv networks still have lots of crime, almost like surveillance is the wrong answer to lowering crime or something - It’s a good answer if you want to watch all the crime that’s still happening - Until police selectively disables some cameras whenever it goes outside. 
 
- It’s a good answer if your goal isn’t actually to lower crime but you say it is so you can add buttloads of surveillance for data gathering 
- Honestly if we want crime to go down we should just stop reporting it. - How much good did it make in all these years before tv? 
 
 
- Obvious spyware grift is obvious. - It’s owned by Amazon. A no brainer to avoid, really 
 
- Here we go with this 1984-nonsense 
- I HATE IT HERE 
- This just in, Ring’s CEO admits to being a complete idiot. Look at the cameras in the UK. Mass surveillance does not stop crime. 
- Oh that’s awesome I didn’t realize cameras are able to create a system where the basic necessities of life aren’t locked down by money, where people aren’t being disenfranchised/marginalized/exploited and not having to fend out for themselves figuring out any way to survive but instead working together to answer everybody’s needs 
- Hey, how about zeroing out wage theft? 
- This guy can get fucked 
- Lol. GTFO here ya clown. Anyone that lives in a big city knows that cameras don’t stop crimes. Tweekers, dirty cops, politicians… none of em give a shit if they’re on camera. 
- Cough<bullshit>cough 
- The only thing it will do is to further reduce our privacy and expose our data to big corpos 
- We are just so fucked from every angle, from this to Teams reporting everything you do to the man to everything else. 
- Ring CEO:  









