I was thinking no way this is the same chav poster and had a good chuckle at this comment.

Accidentally deleted my reply but you’ll likely see it in your inbox still, whoops.

deleted by creator

Even if that stat is correct

Given the other person claimed it was “fabricated” and I’ve provided the same study that was cited in the video, that’s probably all I need to hear from you about this but anyway.

This stat is saying if your partner chokes you in an act of violence (non-consenually) then the risk goes up. The key point being that if someone is willing to choke you in violence, they’re likely to escalate further.

I not only reference that in the initial comment but specifically state that in others in the comment chain.

Good to know, thanks for posting!

Strangulation is among the most lethal forms of domestic violence – and being strangled increases the risk of being killed in the future by 750%. Along with an alarming increase in reported strangulations in Western New York,

The article shown in her video.

Non-fatal strangulation was reported in 10% of abused controls, 45% of attempted homicides and 43% of homicides. Prior non-fatal strangulation was associated with greater than six-fold odds (OR 6.70, 95% CI 3.91–11.49) of becoming an attempted homicide, and over seven-fold odds (OR 7.48, 95% CI 4.53–12.35) of becoming a completed homicide.

Very curious as to what you based your assumption on it being “fabricated” on though.

Edit: Got nothing to say after the study is provided to you after baselessly claiming it was “fabricated” but hanging around to downvote my replies in child comments. Brave man.

Given she’s a science communicator with a PhD in theoretical physics, my instinct wasn’t to immediately assume she “fabricated” this stat.

True there typically is but it’s pretty variable unfortunately.

I’m not quite sure what it is exactly you’re asking and I don’t want to presume. That aside, your risk of being murdered increasing by that amount is wild and definitely worth knowing. Small percentages only seem small in the macro. It was framed in a manner similar to how another poster in this thread stated. “If you didn’t already know, if this has happened to you, you need to make plans to leave. Now, because your life is literally in danger” sort of thing. Abusers specialise in marginalising the concerns of their partners, especially insofar as their abuse and its consequences for their partners.

Unfortunately, it was a non-sexual, DV kind of choking from my understanding.

As I mention in another reply the stat refers to abuse not kink play. Likely polled abuse/DV victims and then followed up with them, but that just a guess. I’ll link the study later if I can track it down.

You know what, fair enough. My reply was more tongue in cheek. I don’t doubt it would be frustrating.

Dark shows on decent/properly calibrated screens are my crack tho. Why must you deprive me.

Oh yeah for sure, that stat is undoubtedly in the context of argument/non-consent; not a consensual kink dynamic. I wondered if it’s because they don’t want to normalise it due to worrying about it carrying over to circumstances outside consensual sex dynamics. Like an abuser trying to argue it being in a BDSM dynamic when it’s actually an abusive one.

I watched a YT video by Dr Angela Collier on Richard Feynman. She drops this incredibly alarming stat that if a partner chokes you, you are 750% more likely to be murdered by that partner. I get that the kink isn’t 1:1 but it does make me wonder if there’s any relation.

Edited to include link to the paper.

I get genuine big mad energy from this more than troll. Wouldn’t be the first time someone banned from reddit comes to the verse thinking they can spout their toddler tier rhetoric only to get banned from half the verse in a couple hours.

Ah yes, Marxist, communist and anarchist. Famously known for their love of tech corporations like google and Facebook. How does one “love a vaccine” lmao? I fucking love antibiotics, Im also currently engaged to a saline bag. Just go back to reddit if you can’t figure out the block button or, more likely, if your main got banned for posting misinformation (I assume given the image). No need to cry about it while unironically calling people weak and easily triggered.

Poster who constantly asks weird arse questions involving age gaps now casually writing rape into their “story”

You reply on some of your post but keep ignoring question about your obsession with age gap relationships. Maybe a troll definitely a weirdo either way.

My understanding was the goal was polluting training data for AI. Not privacy and having their comments skipped. Point is AI won’t have an issue realising it’s not useful/relevant data. Worst case is minor performance issues wasted on parsing the character.

Why not have both

Apart from it being redundant, superseded by th and annoying to read? It being hard to type has never been a complaint that I’ve seen about it.