I should have been more clear with the idea that law enforcement “predict” the “threat” of "anti-AI terrorism. Usually in these case the federal law enforcement is not prophetic as they could possibly have a hand in creating terrorist attacks to blame on low level actions like direct action as seen above. Or they also use FBI undercovers to entrap people who did not have the means to carry out terrorist attacks before the FBI came to help out and then try to arrest them before they could allegedly carry it out. It hits the press, but the court cases have the chance to fall apart, although the court results get much less press coverage.