This part of the speech starts at the timestamp 6:30

  • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Taiwanese

    Don’t care about fascist remnant governments. I literally could care less when they are more brutal to their people than the CPC ever was. Hopefully their government does what is best for their people and surrenders unconditionally to the Chinese mainland.

    Uighur

    Still parroting the U.S state department narrative that was adopted from the fucking actual lunatic Adrian Zens? Cool. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheDeprogram/wiki/index/debunking/uyghur-genocide

    Tibet

    I feel no sympathy for religious theocratic governments that had religious slaves. People of Tibet are freer now then they ever were under religious dogma.

    liver

    What?

    Slightly unserious, here.

    • techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think Aria means that the bourgeois states will spread propaganda to their people and no one will hear Xi’s speech. I don’t think they think that China did any of that

      • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize.

        Yeah, that makes more sense. There was multiple comments when I first made this questioning it with none of Aria’s replies yet. Didn’t see any of those upon making this comment.

      • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize.

        Yeah, I realize that now. Gonna keep it up because I’m not a fan of deleting content but I wasn’t aware as there wasn’t any replies from Aria at the time. My bad.

        • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          To be fair, it can be hard to recognize sarcasm in written form sometimes. That’s why we have /s. Perhaps the OP should have used it.

      • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize. The slightly unserious part I was referencing to what I thought was a remark on “chinese organ-trafficking” with the “liver” part.

        Fucking A+ tier satire. God damn.

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          I wasn’t being satirical, it is my honest concern. I just used an outlandish example of a counter narrative because it barely matters how stupid the counter-narrative is.

          China’s ability to tell their own story and have that heard is far weaker than the west’s, even measured against the fraction of the west’s narrative that is specifically focused on labelling China. It’s not a problem that’ll be fixed quickly.

          (I don’t want to downplay progress either, China’s image in the global south has improved recently, but that doesn’t mean that global south residents are going to disbelieve specific allegations they hear from western sources).

          • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Your honest opinion strangely matches up with concerns of the U.S State Department.

            • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              In the inverse. The U.S. State Department is concerned they’re gaining back soft power too quickly.