Also just straight up a minority in general (from a US perspective), though only by a very slight margin. US population is ~51.5/48.5 in favor of women. Though on a worldwide scale men are instead a slight majority and women a slight minority.
That mugshot is hilarious. You just know he was practicing in a mirror looking for something to make him look cool and defiant, and he settles on “toddler intentionally shitting their pants because you told them it’s time to get ready for bed” as his preferred expression?
Which is weird since their own book explicitly says life begins at first breath, provides instructions for a cheating detecting potion that’ll induce abortion if the woman cheated, etc
I can confirm from kbin to the degree it matters the original poll post is listed as “deleted_by_author” in my comments page, manually opening the URL for the page shows no comments, only the total number of favorites and reduces (possibly only the reduces from kbin specifically as the split shown is 71 up/2 down which is much different than the listed number of down in other comments)
There’s also the issue of some instances having downvoting disabled, and I think I remember reading something about downvoting federating oddly or something
Basically just jalapeño jerky I suppose
I think the idea is intended as something like “Latin. X.”, which isn’t really any better, sounds like the monster from a racist 50s B movie or something. La-tinx is where my mind always defaults to too though
Or at least if they’re going to insist anyway go with something like latinae that vaguely follows grammatical rules and is able to be pronounced
She used to go by a hyphenated name, but Trump had one of his crying diaper baby fits that her uncle Mitt dared to do the absolute bare minimum to try hold him accountable so bullied her into dropping it.
Unless it’s formulated to sublimate into a gas I suppose.
One thing to consider, assuming the red one is mental time travel (which is the only way it’d really be at all useful), you’re essentially murdering everyone who exists from your subjective present to the jump point to replace with at best very similar clones and possibly no one or completely different people. Then you have to also assume the timeline isn’t fixed and you can actually change things, and thus contend with butterfly effect causing divergence making your knowledge less useful. Sure, little changes probably won’t impact things on a global scale for a while, but once you start doing big things like investing or preventing terrorist attacks or something that could cause major divergence. Ethically any kind of useful time travel should be limited to “World is already wiped out” scale scenarios where the alternative is worse.
And funny thing about that book, not only does it never even approach condemning abortion it gives explicit instructions how to perform one with a potion that can detect if a woman cheated as one of the only times it’s mentioned
What about 19 years ago?