MotoAsh

Lots of “normal” feminists do that, too. Specifically, the ones that think “men” must be torn down in order to elevate women.

Anyone who thinks a group of people that aren’t actually in power (not all men actually benefit from patriarchy/machismo) need to be torn down is just contributing to the rat race fucked up world they’re whining about.

It’s not “men” that need to be torn down. It’s the systems that don’t distribute power equitably. These days, it should be pretty damn obvious most men are also not in the “-archy” club.

You mean a company who’s wallet depends on making it sound better than reality would claim it’s better than reality?!

I’m shocked.

There is ALWAYS a “better” battery coming down the pipe. Always. To say no NEW technology couldn’t work is an assumption, but so is assuming those new designs will deliver and be commercially as cheap.

The point still stands that a battery tech for vehicles needs to be power dense and as light as possible. Right now, salt batteries are MUCH worse than other tech. To say that salt batteries will win in the end is as dumb as saying the horse with a gimp will totally win the race after more training.

Even if the horse did have the potential, you don’t know other horses’ potentials nor do you know what other contenders will arise in the mean time.

Is it nice to make someone do the mental labor of coming up with a gift?

Yea, that’s why I’d rather the government itself have an endpoint where the hard part is already implemented.

… ok I’d rather these stupid de-anonymizing laws were found to be against the constitution and completely unable to be forced on us…

That is a good scene.

Eh, IF the government had an endpoint to verify ID information, it wouldn’t be too bad implementation wise. … buuuut the modern government doesn’t provide anything any more and every damn dev team on the planet shouldn’t have forced access to peoples’ freaking IDs…

It’s not about the commodore group, but about the bounds, “trusted more than MS” puts on it.

It’s like someone saying, “well, I like you more than Charles Manson?” It’s almost an insult.

Ehh, wrong movie format. Mostly because by the time someone is literally an enemy combatant, it’s a bit late for words.

Though he has been in a ton of movies by now. If he hadn’t rocketed in to the 21st century by putting himself on ice maybe it could’ve come up.

Because they’re also in there.

I would trust a hobo more than an escaped convict, but that’s still a pretty low bar.

The irony of your stupidity and judgement in that post is hilarious.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

rofl no

Removed by mod

Yea, it’s definitely not bad for stationary storage, at least when compensating for the current limits as the charge drops.

Salt batteries already exist and are commercialized. They just suck for vehicles and other energy-dense needs because their voltage drops slowly as they discharge. Lithium holds a strong voltage until it’s about done.

That might not sound significant, but not only does it directly cut nearly in half the available power, it also greatly effects situations where lots of power is needed. If you need as many watts as the battery can only safely supply down to 60%, then you only have effective access to 40% of a battery that’s already smaller capacity in the first place.

That question should be asked of every franchise Disney owns.

It’d definitely be a good thing. Point is, getting rid of cars won’t be a good thing until effective alternatives are actually available.

It will always be possible. The punishments need to be very harsh, because white collar crime never “needs” to happen.