Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoValidlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up1209arrow-down112
arrow-up1197arrow-down1imageValidlemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squareHari Bari@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up72·1 month agoWhoever thought this “is what House deserves” did not understand the character at all. So long as he got to “solve the puzzle”, he would not care much afterwards, relatively speaking. It would definitely not punish him. Killing the patient before being able to diagnose & cure them, that would for instance.
minus-squareCourtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 month agoI think if you want to torture him, let him treat someone, and don’t let him know if he was right or not.
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoJust take new poisons, viruses or whatever every time your condition improves. Then you’ll be in control of the edging (so to say), and therefore also the final denial/ruin.
Whoever thought this “is what House deserves” did not understand the character at all.
So long as he got to “solve the puzzle”, he would not care much afterwards, relatively speaking.
It would definitely not punish him. Killing the patient before being able to diagnose & cure them, that would for instance.
I think if you want to torture him, let him treat someone, and don’t let him know if he was right or not.
Just take new poisons, viruses or whatever every time your condition improves. Then you’ll be in control of the edging (so to say), and therefore also the final denial/ruin.