I saw a clip of a guy saying that Ukraine is going through a command reform:
-
Military officials will be forced to adapt or leave.
-
Military command will be highly “streamlined” and “automated” with “new technology.”
The video was claiming this as a huge win and that Russia would be outdated by comparison and that military personnel, infrantry and such, would be treated more humanely.
However, what it sounds like to me, what I’m hearing instead of those claims, is that all military power and authority is being centralized and that ChatGPT or Grok or some shit is being given reigns of a fucking drone swarm. Is that what is happening? Two things I can say quite confidently is that: consolidating such power such that less total people have any say in matters has never lead to more humane treatment, historically, and that AI chatbots have never shown any capacity for morality nor hesitation in regards to the sanctity of human life and nature.
Is the Trump admin pushing this bullshit on Ukraine? Am I reading too much into this? I’m naturally very skeptical of things like this.
EDIT: I’m pretty sure the video I saw was just some AI Techbro bullshitting and in reference to changes from Brigades (smaller departments) to Corps (big offices managing their own small departments) structure. Nobody can really find info on what he was talking about, AFAIK.
There are other AI systems than LLM slop machines.
UA has been successfully using AI vision systems for a while, which is why Russia is trying to camouflage trucks with dazzle paint.
I got no results for
"UA" AI vision militaryin search engines, but regardless there are no AI capable of competently replacing military command or any other complex decision making task.I can verify that I’ve read about Ukraine developing and using “AI vision” for UAVs for a while.
You may recall articles mentioning operators selecting targets outside of electronic warfare (EW) and then triggering the “AI”, which would head for the target. Once the UAV hits the EW, the “AI vision” (mission learning) takes it all the way, making EW generally ineffective.
I agree with you that LLM are slop and garbage. I don’t think that is the “AI” Ukraine is using. I think it is more akin to video game AI, which is just well designed logic (“AI”) that controls non-player allies/enemies/environment/economy/etc.
If tasks are well defined and repeatable they can be logiced away (“AI-ed”). A not particularly related example of what this could look like is weekly posts I make about fediverse software.
I gather the data from sources and then do analysis on them to get insights/takeaways from the data. I could do this by hand/spreadsheet, but that would be annoying and time consuming. I didn’t use LLMs, but I could/am arguing that the code I developed is artificial intelligence (AI, in the vein of video game AI) that automates a well defined and repetitive task.
I hope/expect this is the “AI” Ukraine is developing. If you want to check out what I mean about my post examples, you can head to !fedilytics@piefed.zip / https://piefed.zip/c/fedilytics.
Edit: fixed spelling.
A UAV isn’t going to sit in the command room and make phone calls.
I provided two different examples of “AI”. The “AI vision” UAV (machine learning) and a command-control logic design (video game “AI”).
Would you call a video game’s AI an LLM? I wouldn’t because it’s not. No LLMs were used in my examples/descriptions.
A UAV isn’t going to sit in the command room and make phone calls.
I very highly doubt that Ukraine is trying to automate command rooms to give orders based on GPT hallucinations.
But you can definitely have machine learning algorithms learn how to effectively control drone swarms. Or learn to improve logistics and things like that.
Machine learning algorithms are also called AI and have been around for way longer than GPT or Grok
If your logistics are being managed by AI then you’re fucked, bro.
why?
Per this Reuters article, AI seems to largely be deployed in the contexts of frontline operations and counter-drone systems.
The types of AI that such systems would use would be more specialized than general purpose LLMs like ChatGPT, trained on military reconnaissance data rather than generalized human knowledge. I’m generally anti-AI and find Palantir’s involvement concerning, but if such systems help Ukraine reduce frontline losses and improve its defensive capabilities by accelerating its counter-drone capabilities against increasingly rapid Russian drones, then perhaps in this rare instance, AI might be beneficial.
Importantly, however, Ukraine should ensure that its use of the technology doesn’t result in its own drones accidentally going off-course from intended military targets, something that Russian propagandists would use to fuel far-right anti-Ukraine sentiment across the west.
I don’t think that’s related because it doesn’t seem to have anything to do with changes in command structure?
Most articles talking about AI and the Ukrainian military refer to recent plans to unify the use of AI under a singular command structure. This follows them setting up their ‘A1’ AI center in March, but it seems to only be a component of the Ukrainian military, not an overhaul of their military command as a whole.
They did reform the structure of their military to be closer aligned with NATO, but that predated their recent shift towards AI.
Some commanders have a better track record than others. Sometimes one has even transfered to a different area and suddenly things go much better in that area. The bad ones need to get better.
