• SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    To hide his health issues.

    Now who else hid their health issues? Hitler, Stalin, Ataturk, Péron, basically lots of dictators.

      • dermanus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I wonder how long it will be for Trump? I think at least a week. It’ll take multiple rounds of denials, a sudden resurgence in social media content a la Herman Cain, and a sloppy AI video before they admit it. Probably at least two weeks before everyone knows it but the WH is insisting otherwise.

  • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Trump can have his ballroom as soon as we repeal the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929, and expand the Capitol building to accommodate the 1500 representatives we should have using the average district size from the time.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s weird that far more helpful updates to our government like the above tend to get buried under what I consider rather a large and stupid distraction - the left seems to have mostly adopted discussion about a “gerontology” ( 🙄 ) and adopted the right’s drumbeat about “term limits”, sigh.

      Sure, other things like voter suppression and making voting even more difficult seem to get attention, and that’s good but I don’t hear much about what you describe and it’s a well-known problem. I think dumb things like term limits and how many times a politician has traveled around the sun get orders of magnitude more attention.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah several of the ideas that they’ve been suggesting have zero chance of going anywhere, often because they actually require constitutional amendments.

        The Permanent Apportionment Act was passed by a simple majority. It can be removed with the same.

        The House is sized for the population in 1910. It created a defacto second Senate, and essentially allowed gerrymandering to become an effective political tool. That Congressional screwup needs to be fixed, and it can easily. But that requires members of Congress to give up some of their individual power.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean do you support the presidential term limit? Then why shouldn’t there be one for senators? I mean you guys have a major problem where a bunch of old people with no skin in the game are running your country.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The two terms thing is fine in some cases; I would be fine with 4 terms or more for Obama, though.

          I just don’t see how arbitrarily focusing on age or term limits solves one fucking thing. We have too much money in politics. We have cases where land has more rights than actual voters. We have no ranked choice voting. And as if all that wasn’t bad enough, Republicans are actively trying to make it all worse.

          I don’t see how having young douchebags in office would make it any better than old douchebags. In either case, they just do what the money says.

          Talking about the age of representation is nothing but one gigantic distraction. If the voters think they are too old, by all means, they could show up to the primaries. If the voters think they have had too many terms, by all means, primary them.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        Quite the opposite actually. Gerrymandering is only as effective as it is because of the limited seats. This allows maps to be drawn with wildly arbitrary lines to split districts to achieve razor thin margins. A byproduct of gerrymandering is that the districts it creates have very weak control.

        Further, the larger number of districts allows for more potential candidate options. By splitting up everything even more, smaller candidates, and alternative parties have a greater chance. Political spending being forced to be split cross 3x the candidates can only be a net positive for us at this point as we try to fix this shit.

        • GutterRat42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Plus, smaller districts means more personal connection to the candidates. John Smith from fucks know where can talk smack about the nameless immigrant neighbor 3 towns over, and you may not care, but when little Jimmy from your home town talks smack about Jose who invited you to be his daughter’s godfather, like hell will you vote for him. Them are fighting words.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s all about that new ballroom. Construction has halted due to a lawsuit from the National Trust and Republicans now argue it’s vital for both the Don’s health and safety. You can’t make this shit up.

    • Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      He should be forced to put the whitehouse back exactly as it was before, brick by brick and pay for it personally. Wrecking the whitehouse before the 250th is probably hilarious to his handlers in the Kremlin

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Imagine being so rich and entitled that you demand everyone else in the country spend $1 billion to build a facility that will (just partially) give you medical attention.

      Now imagine being elected to represent the people who the rich guy wants to pay for that, and spending your term not representing those peoples’ interests but instead finding new ways to justify giving the already rich guy their money.

      Now imagine being the voters living paycheck to paycheck and seeing both of these things, and being like, “Well, at least it isn’t Kamala.”

      At this point my head hurts and I can’t imagine any more for some reason.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      you ain’t gonna convince any of the majority of people who don’t want the ballroom in the first place, to approve of a different use of the same fucking space as a facility to keep an ailing moron-in-chief alive.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes but now they spin the narrative that some people are actively hurting potus and endangering MAGA. Blocking the ballroom is domestic terrorism!!!

        • AmbientDread@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 days ago

          Trolling on a national and international level is their version of governing. Meanwhile the Rapepublibcans in Congress and SCOTUS soil the nation for generations to come

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 days ago

    As a taxpayer, I’ll agree to a new hospital for him if he resigns and pleads guilty to the criminal cases against him and accepts all maximum sentences and it’s a prison hospital.

    If he doesn’t like my terms, then he can simply use a portion of all of the wealth he’s grifted in the last year and build his own fucking hospital on the grounds of Mar-a-Lago.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ll agree he can go down a spider hole with a diet Coke and a cyanide capsule. As a long as nobody lets him out alive.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    So the secret is the BS the administration made up after they were told that they’d need congressional approval if it really was just a ballroom

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hospital or Sanitarium? Please include the latest technology of padded rooms and SHOCK therapy. Lobotomy anyone???