Inspired by another post.

Quick sources.

According to Google, a single search requires about 0.0003 kWh of energy.

https://www.rwdigital.ca/blog/how-much-energy-do-google-search-and-chatgpt-use/

Each ChatGPT query consumes an estimated 2.9 Wh of electricity…

https://balkangreenenergynews.com/chatgpt-consumes-enough-power-in-one-year-to-charge-over-three-million-electric-cars/

Edit: I’m an idiot for not even considering conversions. I simply pasted the numbers from the sources. Apologies.

0.0003 kWh is 0.3 Wh, and 2.9 Wh is 0.0029 kWh.

I think the regular search is effectively one-tenth a chatgpt prompt.

…according to a simple calculator, and a lot of commenters who’ve now accidentally made this funnier.

I’m not an electrician.

Okay, after some more rabbling, here’s some edits. Take your pick:

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      29·
      3 days ago

      The unit bullshittery going on in this meme is frying my brain. I need a nap.

      If I can stay awake long enough maybe I can work out how this works. My PC burns around 500Wh under load, so the time I just spent playing Abyssus was burning about 3 GPT searches a minute, by that estimation. It’s still much less than 30, and I can probably figure whatever I’m looking for in much less than that, but still.

      I wonder if it’s supposed to be better or worse if I decide to burn all that at home by running a local LLM. I don’t think my GPU is more power efficient than their data centers, and it’d almost certainly run longer than 20 seconds, but I do have pretty green power sources in this area and it is air cooled.

      I guess it depends on whether my office gets hot enough to make me turn on the AC.

    • EisFrei@lemmy.world
      82·
      3 days ago

      While we’re at it: Ten times less shouldn’t be a thing.

      Ten percent, 0.1 times, a tenth …