Nintendo, while aggressively litigious, do so to maintain the value and exclusivity of their IP.
Their games also never go on sale, and all sell really well over time, unlike many releases from other publishers.
The result is that Nintendo are able to release a solid cadence of high quality, first party games free of other forms of aggressive monetisation, maintaining the value of the games as art.
I like a lot of Nintendo’s stuff, but I fail to see how anything lawyers do is in any way related to what their development studios do. You’re gonna have to explain how you think these affect each other.