I wonder how regolith might work out as shielding, as proposed in some popular sci-fi series. Its added mass, to be sure, but regolith plus infernal pressure vessels is probably a good trade-off for the mechanical complexity and added mass.
There was a proposed method of making a space habitat that I found fascinating, though someone smarter than me would have to address its plausibility. This would have been in a book from Heinlein, Asimov, Niven, or Pournelle, possibly a collection of non-fiction essays on colonizing space.
The idea is that you find a sufficiently large asteroid with high iron content. You hollow out a cylinder in the core and pack it with water ice, and then plug the end. Then you spin the thing on its axis while bathing it with lasers or focused solar light. This heats the surface until it is molten. Eventually the heat penetrates to the water ice core, which boils, inflating the molten iron like a balloon. Once the thing has cooled, you have a hollow space where you can start building your habitat, and a nice robust outer layer, and the whole thing is spinning to simulate gravity.
Again, I don’t know if this falls into the category of “sounds neat but is totally implausible,” or “sounds insane but is actually technically entirely sound,” but it stuck with me as a neat way to build a habitat.
I’m going to go with “sounds neat but is totally implausible.” Not totally implausible, but it’s a lot of work just to roll a bunch of unpredictable dice with the chaotic behavior of the boiling water and the chemical composition of the asteroid.
The water vapor is going to find the path of least resistance and come erupting out of the molten metal, probably quite explosively and you’re going to loose a bunch of valuable mass in the process.
EDIT: There may be a way to do this and get more predictable results (if you have a ton of energy to melt the asteroid very fast and very uniformly from all directions at once) but it still sounds unnecessarily complicated. There are simpler, cheaper ways to get better, more controlled outcomes.
I wonder how regolith might work out as shielding, as proposed in some popular sci-fi series. Its added mass, to be sure, but regolith plus infernal pressure vessels is probably a good trade-off for the mechanical complexity and added mass.
I suspect you meant a different word, but it’s honestly better this way.
Lol, yeah I did but now I’m definitely leaving it
There was a proposed method of making a space habitat that I found fascinating, though someone smarter than me would have to address its plausibility. This would have been in a book from Heinlein, Asimov, Niven, or Pournelle, possibly a collection of non-fiction essays on colonizing space.
The idea is that you find a sufficiently large asteroid with high iron content. You hollow out a cylinder in the core and pack it with water ice, and then plug the end. Then you spin the thing on its axis while bathing it with lasers or focused solar light. This heats the surface until it is molten. Eventually the heat penetrates to the water ice core, which boils, inflating the molten iron like a balloon. Once the thing has cooled, you have a hollow space where you can start building your habitat, and a nice robust outer layer, and the whole thing is spinning to simulate gravity.
Again, I don’t know if this falls into the category of “sounds neat but is totally implausible,” or “sounds insane but is actually technically entirely sound,” but it stuck with me as a neat way to build a habitat.
I’m going to go with “sounds neat but is totally implausible.” Not totally implausible, but it’s a lot of work just to roll a bunch of unpredictable dice with the chaotic behavior of the boiling water and the chemical composition of the asteroid.
The water vapor is going to find the path of least resistance and come erupting out of the molten metal, probably quite explosively and you’re going to loose a bunch of valuable mass in the process.
EDIT: There may be a way to do this and get more predictable results (if you have a ton of energy to melt the asteroid very fast and very uniformly from all directions at once) but it still sounds unnecessarily complicated. There are simpler, cheaper ways to get better, more controlled outcomes.