• WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Car brains are out in force for this thread, lol.

    Apparently, if you can’t transit products by car or truck, directly to the front-door of every business, the city will collapse.

  • HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Gentle reminder: This site is basically a tabloid at this point and should not be used as a serious source. If you have to, at least use an archived version.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think the ideal is an alternating block structure

    Pedestrian Street,

    Road,

    Pedestrian Street,

    Transit only Lane,

    Pedestrian Street,

    Road,

    Pedestrian Street,

    Transit Only Lane,

    Where Pedestrian streets cross roads, have car traffic enter a roundabout sunk below the pedestrian path, when they cross transit lanes, have a gate bridge that closes off the lane whenever a tram or bus isn’t near the crossing, same deal when car traffic crosses a tram or bus lane

    Voila, maximum restriction of cross interaction between three separate modes of transport, a full 75% of which is dedicated to pedestrian and transit use, and the last quarter there mostly just for the benefit of last mile package delivery and emergency services, as well as the odd profession that legit has to use automobile transport for whatever reason.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So if a downtown business needs a new copy machine? a restaurant needs a pallet of vegetables? a hospital needs a new MRI system? what are grocery stores supposed to do to receive freight? Gonna build light rail to every loading dock in the city? Have an Amazon drone fly it in? Maybe we could drop frozen food off with horse drawn wagons.

    Why is logistics an afterthought for… anyone with more than 2 brain cells?

    Cargo trucks are the economy. Nobody has a replacement yet.

      • infreq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Are you fucking kidding me? Have you ever had to transport anything jeavor or large in real life?

          • homoludens@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            TIL we never actually moved my girlfriend’s whole household by bike (and cart) when we moved in together.

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Why is it that you think your anecdote can be broadly applied to all cargo transit needs?

              Do you think a wind turbine could be carried by bicycle?

              • relevants@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Ah yes, wind turbines which are famously delivered to locations in dense urban centers.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Oh great, how many cargo bikes would we need to carry a pallet of milk cartons to the local grocery store? How many would we need to replace one truckload?

        Doesn’t matter because you also need a refrigeration system to keep the milk from spoiling. Good luck putting that on a bike.

    • teuast@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      So what did we do before we had widespread cargo trucking? Did we just not deliver any cargo ever? Everyone just wandered around dropping limes all over the place 'cause they’d only figured out how to carry them with their bare hands, until Henry Ford invented gas station sushi and revolutionized transportation forever?

      Well, in the interest of not wasting everybody’s time, I’ll tell you: they organized their towns and cities around rail. This happened right here in the United States, with the stated example being in Philadelphia. Even the old West Coast cities were organized in much the same way for a long time. That was the only way they had available to them, and somehow, they still managed to have an economy.

      We have a lot of retrofitting to do to regain that ideal. But it’s possible.

      • S410@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Trucks were invented in 1890s. By 1900 the world’s population was 1.6 billion, 5 times smaller than it is now.

        But population numbers aren’t the only thing that has changed since then.

        A hundred some years ago FDA didn’t exist. You could buy eggs, meat, etc. from your local farmers and butchers. Now, you need licenses and to comply with a whole bunch of different codes. Fewer people can comply with those, so the average distance things need to be shipped has increased.

        There’s, also, a lot more things nowadays that were never possible to produce locally (or even just close by) to begin with. Semiconductors, medications, even fine fabrics for clothing require fairly complex processes and logistics. You can’t just plop a fab or a lab in every large-ish city - that is going to be even more of a nightmare to supply with resources necessary to keep it running, than shipping final product from somewhere else far away.

        • teuast@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          All of those are phenomenal arguments for heavily reinvesting in our freight rail.

          • Hyperreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Rail can’t realistically be connected to everyone’s house. You always need a solution for that final mile.

            For smaller stuff, a (cargo) bike is a perfect solution.

            For heavier stuff, like a mobile work place or a 40ft steel beam, you will always need something else. Right now the best option is a (small, electric) van. For that you will need at least some roads. You can prevent them from being accessible to anything but professionals who absolutely need access. But you will still need a limited amount of them.

            Perfect is the enemy of good. Being a zealot about this, is self-defeating and won’t convince enough people.

          • S410@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Trains are great and they’re definitely underutilized in the modern world, but the thing they excel at is getting stuff from point A to point B (like a warehouse), not spreading it around across thousands of different destinations.

            Building a light railway to each and every walmart, target, 7eleven, etc. it’s just not practical in any way:

            My city, for example, has a relatively extensive tram system. You can get around most of the city by it and there’s quite a few stores that are right next to tracks, so, theoretically, something like that could be used to deliver goods within a city.

            However, it’s, both, way louder than cars and trucks (I used to live right next to a railway) and every time a tram or its powerline break, the entire line stops. You can’t, exactly, drive around a broken tram when you’re on rail.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        So what did we do before we had widespread cargo trucking?

        Agrarian society - wagons and hand carts.

        they organized their towns and cities around rail

        Towns and cities were significantly smaller and less complex. Rail does not scale. Adding new rail spurs is prohibitively time-consuming and inflexible.

        Seriously, how would you propose to handle citywide garbage/recycling collection with light rail and no motorized vehicles? (Just for instance).

        • teuast@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Your history is wrong. We had begun industrializing about 100 years before trucks were invented and more like 160 before they really became dominant.

          And are you literally arguing that building rail is more cost prohibitive, time consuming, and inflexible than building roads? Like actually? Unironically? I’m sorry, buddy, but when you start getting into numbers, that’s my territory and you’re out of your depth. https://alankandel.scienceblog.com/2014/01/11/rails-vs-roads-for-value-utilization-emissions-savings-difference-like-night-and-day/

          If only we properly invested in history education in this country. Then maybe people wouldn’t be embarrassing themselves by making arguments like yours.

          • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            This only addresses passenger transit and none of the logistics issues which have been my actual argument.

            This is not practical for transporting cargo around a moderately sized urban area. It never will be.

          • Hyperreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            We had begun industrializing about 100 years before trucks were invented and more like 160 before they really became dominant.

            We enslaved, hurt, and killed millions of horses.

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why is logistics an afterthought for… anyone with more than 2 brain cells?

      People with more than 2 brain cells acknowledge that people aren’t advocating to remove service vehicles such as emergency or delivery ones, or public transport like busses. So thank you for this incredible self own. That’s what car brain does to you.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        A government adviser has called for roads in cities to be “ripped out completely” to combat air pollution.

        First paragraph.

        • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Maybe read a little more than just the first paragraph next time around. But thanks for proving my point, 2 cells.

          Pointing to the “greening” of city centres such as Seoul and Utrecht, he said: “We should start changing our cities and actually start thinking about ripping out road infrastructure and turning them into green spaces or green transport corridors. We have to look beyond traffic.”

          This needed to be combined with a drive to get people out of their cars and into walking, cycling and using public transport, which would not only help tackle climate change but also improve health and so reduce pressures on the NHS.

            • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Holy shit dude. Maybe it’s more like 1 cell.

              This needed to be combined with a drive to get people out of their cars and into walking, cycling and using public transport

              • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I don’t get the point of highlighting “public transport”. Maybe you’re not explaining your point very well, or not understanding mine.

                My point is that no public transport options are practical as logistics solutions, especially for last-mile delivery, and therefore ripping out the roads completely (as proposed in the article) will never be practical. There will always be a need for small, independently powered vehicles to fill the gaps.

                • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  What the fuck do you think buses are driving on? Christ almighty. This entire fucking topic is about private cars, not service vehicles. You’re needlessly obtuse.

    • SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      They don’t actually rip up roads but just put retractable bollards there that are lowered for emergency vehicles and cargo delivery with a permit.

      • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        They do rip up roads, just not quite literally all of them. You’ll always have at least one lane, depending on the location. But the rest, including parking spaces, can be replaced with something else like greenspaces instead.

  • AKADAP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    To take this to its logical conclusion, once the streets are gone, there is no need for buildings anymore, so they can tear those all down and plant a forest. But then you wonder where you are going to put all the people who used to live and work there.

  • homoludens@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t read the article (apywall), but it seems to me that there might be a distinction between road and street that some people in this thread don’t know about.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Nimby crash course, vocabulary edition!

    Roads in the 21st century incarnation of English almost always refer specifically to car infrastructure.

    Streets are not the same as roads, it describes the space between two rows of properties. Modern streets typically contain a road for cars, but also sidewalks, trees, gardens, lounge spaces, etc. There’s a reason it’s called street food and not road food, because they’re selling on the streets and not in the middle of the roads where they’ll get run over.

    Every time something like this gets brought up, you always get Nimbys screeching how this will evict everyone from their homes or whatever, and I think it’s because they think removing roads means also removing the streets themselves, when in reality it means the streets get restored and become much more welcoming and people friendly.