Maybe read a little more than just the first paragraph next time around. But thanks for proving my point, 2 cells.
Pointing to the “greening” of city centres such as Seoul and Utrecht, he said: “We should start changing our cities and actually start thinking about ripping out road infrastructure and turning them into green spaces or green transport corridors. We have to look beyond traffic.”
This needed to be combined with a drive to get people out of their cars and into walking, cycling and using public transport, which would not only help tackle climate change but also improve health and so reduce pressures on the NHS.
I don’t get the point of highlighting “public transport”. Maybe you’re not explaining your point very well, or not understanding mine.
My point is that no public transport options are practical as logistics solutions, especially for last-mile delivery, and therefore ripping out the roads completely (as proposed in the article) will never be practical. There will always be a need for small, independently powered vehicles to fill the gaps.
What the fuck do you think buses are driving on? Christ almighty. This entire fucking topic is about private cars, not service vehicles. You’re needlessly obtuse.
I’m sorry, you think this article is hyperbole? I didn’t realize it was published by the Onion.
Also if you feel you need to be regularly derogatory in order to make your point, your point probably isn’t worth making. Or maybe you could just be more creative with it? If I wanted a rerun I’d just go back and read your previous comments.
No I don’t think that, but alright. I think by now we’re down to 0 cell. If you think that’s derogatory then you might want to go back to your comment that initiated this entire thing. I threw you enough bones already to feed all dogs on this planet for a decade. Enjoy the block.
Maybe read a little more than just the first paragraph next time around. But thanks for proving my point, 2 cells.
Holy shit dude. Maybe it’s more like 1 cell.
I don’t get the point of highlighting “public transport”. Maybe you’re not explaining your point very well, or not understanding mine.
My point is that no public transport options are practical as logistics solutions, especially for last-mile delivery, and therefore ripping out the roads completely (as proposed in the article) will never be practical. There will always be a need for small, independently powered vehicles to fill the gaps.
What the fuck do you think buses are driving on? Christ almighty. This entire fucking topic is about private cars, not service vehicles. You’re needlessly obtuse.
No, this ‘entire fucking topic’ is about ripping city roads out completely. It’s the title of the article.
Let me educate you, 1 cell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole
I’m sorry, you think this article is hyperbole? I didn’t realize it was published by the Onion.
Also if you feel you need to be regularly derogatory in order to make your point, your point probably isn’t worth making. Or maybe you could just be more creative with it? If I wanted a rerun I’d just go back and read your previous comments.
No I don’t think that, but alright. I think by now we’re down to 0 cell. If you think that’s derogatory then you might want to go back to your comment that initiated this entire thing. I threw you enough bones already to feed all dogs on this planet for a decade. Enjoy the block.