• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or maybe tell bosses that if your job can be done remotely it should be done remotely. Then there’s more room on the bus for people who need to be in meatspace to do their jobs.

  • Rambler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Recently visited York (UK) and they have a fantastic bus system - and they’re electric.

    • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Busses in my city are also going electric. So far only the local routes. The longer distance routes are still diesel

  • Drun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, you should see buses in my city. Dirty, thirty years old, overpopulated graves on wheels with no air conditioners.

    Never again.

    • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      if you don’t think 68 people trying to drive 68 cars on the same route is going to cause congestion on the roads, and thus “halting”, where do you think traffic jams come from?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The correct answer actually should -and could- be 0 gallons if they simply cycle to work. Granted, that requires them to have the right infrastructure available, but if (once) that existed, the vast majority of the work force could cycle to work happily. Most people don’t live 20 miles or more from where they work

    • WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, I’d love to cycle 56km to and from work each day. Especially right after a night shift.

      We should just invent portals already.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        56 kms is far, indeed. Thsts what you make public transportation for. Trains, busses.

        Well done, the would be more comfortable and faster than a car.

        However, I did 25 kms to and from every day. Took me 45 minutes and it was super healthy

        • XiELEd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          45 minutes is a long time near nightfall, though… Honestly I’d rather take a bus at 5PM, even at 12km, since there are other people and it feels much safer.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It could also be 0 gallons if the busses are electrified, or if the rail system is expanded, or if we stop pushing office workers to commute every day.

      There are many routes to 0 emissions.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh sure.

        I’m just sayjt that we need to change the way we live. Like you said, people should not be required to work in offices anymore. If they physically need to be at locations, let them walk for short distances, cycle for medium distances and use public transportation for large distances.

        Most cities in the world have been redesigned over the past 80 years for cars. It’s insane and it left most cities awful places to live in. Almost all Dutch cities have been redesigned for people. So people walk and cycle because they can, and the cities look and feel amazing and beautiful.

    • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How many gallons does the ambulance take to get the cyclist to the hospital after the hit and run?

      (Seriously tho bicycles ftw except in winter)

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Less, probably, because cycling in on itself is safer than driving a car. Lower speeds, less mass, less injuries.

        Also, winter cycling.is awesome

        • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I was being facetious; ambulance fuel use is a silly comparison :)

          Listening to all y’all winter cyclists I lament that I live in a city where the bike lanes are where the city piles up the snow it plows off the car lanes on the streets. RIP me. It gives me hope and happiness to know that there are cities that don’t do this!

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It makes a good point but only if your country actually has public transport.

    If you live somewhere with zero public transport, the car is your only option.

    • XiELEd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s why the post advocates for public transport. So that we can have better options.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s great when all those people live in the same block and go to work at the same company and have the same hours.

    But Frank lives 10 miles away and works on the other side of town. And Tim lives 3 towns over and works the night shift. Bill lives in the country and works 40 miles away. Eddy lost a leg in the war and while he is only 1/2 mile from the bus station, can’t walk that far with his disability.

    When it is convenient, it is convenient, but there’s a reason why when given the choice, most normal people will drive their car instead no matter what the nonsense in this subs likes to pretend is real.

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spoken like a true clueless 'murican. What the fuck do you think bus lines are?

    • XiELEd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe your public transport infrastructure needs improvement? I don’t think this post wants to judge you— it’s advocating for public transport to be paid more attention. My cousin lives 3 towns away from her workplace— she commutes with a bus or jeepney. We have either buses, vans, or jeepneys; combined they operate 24/7. Hell, my university has students more than 5 municipalities away, the buses start operations early in the morning. Our classes start at 6:30 AM. Oh and btw, our buses have routes more than 300km. Maybe even more. Regarding Eddy, we have something in my country called a motorela or a tricycle, that operates locally in neighbourhoods. He won’t have to walk far, he just has to wait for one and let it deliver him to a waiting area.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      can’t walk that far with his disability.

      Neither he can drive. Or in some countries even not allowed to.

      while he is only 1/2 mile from the bus station

      1. This is seriously fucked.
      2. Powered wheelchair.
      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hand-controls are a thing. Eddy is perfectly fine driving his handi-van around. He’s not too keen on when motorcycles part in between the handicapped spots though.

        • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jessie got shot in the face in the war, his lack of depth perception from having one eye stops him from driving.

          Fred, Stephanie, Phil, Jack, and Masha all have severe hearing loss from the war (Jack’s is actually from training for the war), while they can still drive, it’s safer for them not too.

          Nick, Chloe, Phil (different Phil), and Jessie (same Jessie) all got blown up in the war, driving vehicles is extremely stressful for them. Being a passenger to varying less degrees. Trains don’t seem to trigger any reaction, and busses don’t for at least one of them (not sure about the others)

  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Nobody is arguing it isn’t efficient. It’s a pain in the ass and I need to deal with randoms in public.

  • Serinus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, but buses generally suck. Give me actual rail, thanks.

    The DC Metro was amazing.

  • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And never mind the rampant spread of bedbugs and disease, being exposed to violence and sexual assault, risking being arrested simply for angering the bus driver, being made late to work or even missing it entirely because of bus breakdowns, route changes or cancellations, or any number of problems that are more easily rectified with an electric car or a bike

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, they are inherent issues. You can’t control who goes on that bus and therefore can’t guarantee the safety of passengers. You can’t control whether buses break down or if the routes will change or not, so you can’t guarantee riders will get to work on time, if at all. And in many cities, bus service is so poor that jobs will not hire people who ride the bus for those reasons.

        You also can’t stop people from spreading bedbugs and disease, and we all saw how well you reacted to that during covid.

        Accept that you’re just wrong on this. No matter how much you want buses to be a viable solution, they just aren’t.

      • Lime66@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least in my experience most of the traffic is people trying to go into London from commuter towns, and they’ll take the motorways not the streets

    • severspade@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      According to a study conducted in 1000 cities in 50 countries based on data from connected vehicles and phones. Not disagreeing with the premise but I expect there are plenty of other more “congested” cities, visit Manila or Jakarta for example. The UK should however definitely do more to fund its public infrastructure.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nice. I have to travel like 17 miles to the nearest bus station. This fixes everything! /s

    Better off with my own vehicle when it’s only like 8 miles to work. I’d be literally wasting 9 miles to the bus station and 9 miles back in my own vehicle to even get back and forth to the bus station.

    Edit: Seriously, have any of you tried traveling 17 miles to the west, only to catch a bus going 25 miles to the east, passing your own town to get to work? Then going 25 miles back, only to have to drive your own vehicle back home, because the bus don’t stop there?

    Better off just taking my own vehicle to work.

    • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Infrastructure and non transit orieted developmental problem. the place you live was likely built with only the car in mind.