WhatsApp isn’t the only messenger lacking cryptographic assurances for new group members. In 2022, a team that included some of the same researchers that analyzed WhatsApp found that Matrix—an open source and proprietary platform for chat and collaboration clients and servers—also provided no cryptographic means for ensuring only authorized members join a group. The Telegram messenger, meanwhile, offers no end-to-end encryption for group messages, making the app among the weakest for ensuring the confidentiality of group messages.

Precisely. They also explained why that’s the case. Basically the reference stuff isn’t pure. It’s just they are exactly what they’re saying in the label.

I just call it “X (formerly Twitter)” for SEO reasons.

How in the FUCk can I search for a single letter in order to find anything?

The sun imploding in the next few billions years. I’ve had conversations about that that I could see in the person’s eyes that they were getting really scared about it.

Seems like a nice idea but I’m gonna place a bet here and say that this will be heavily gamefied by those fake Elon Musk streams trying to sell crypto or something similar.

This could also be exploited by those who use info stealers to hijack browser sessions and hype fraudulent streams.

I just wish we could also sort the leaderboard by category. I have no interest in gossip or drama.

I think you might be interested on this Wikipedia article: Trepanning

Yeah, this left a bad taste.

At least he revoked this section of the decision a couple hours later.

You’re right but IMO that part of the article that you highlighted should be the news, not the “we should make Musk do something”.

Musk is a billionaire that thrives on attention so any form of headline that cites his name is playing his game.

Twitter is a company with investors. They should be accountable to what happens in their domain. And not by having their wrist slapped because – for the nth time – something bad happened. Media should be saying by now that Twitter is a bad place. Like they did with other social networks before.

I’m not sure if Twitter has “responsibilities” to begin with. It has what we - as a society - give it the legitimacy to have.

Life is too short to read all the words

I lasted about 4 answers until I remembered that TAS in this context means The Animated Series and not Tool Assisted Speedrun

I genuinely don’t know. Their name was just the first one that came to my mind.

Why are we suddenly selling more NAS grade HDDs?

• Seagate executives

Any idea of why is that?

A car

Nope. I don’t like the format.

A 30 seconds video is like repeating the same mistakes that turned Twitter (yes, even before Elon Musk) to what it is today: a place that there’s no shade of gray, no nuance and everything is outrageous. A Short has no time to elaborate on anything and can simplify the subject so much that it becomes just misinformation.

Also I don’t believe it’s worth for creators in the long run. I’m not a creator myself but I believe that the time-effort to create a video is not linear with its duration. They can make a short so elaborated and viral that it would be more worth to create a full video in regards of sponsorship, ad revenue and subscription retention.

Since I’ve adopted PowerToys -> PowerToys Run and set a shortcut to open it with “Super (windows key) + Space” I don’t know what a start menu is.

If you take a look into the fitness bubble on YouTube you will see military propaganda too. They’re often competing against real soldiers/SEALS/whatever to demonstrate how well prepared they’re are in the case of war. Back in the subject of engineering, William Osman was also sponsored by the Navy (I think) one time.

Wait what’s the trouble you’re experienceing trying to pull a sock?

New captcha just dropped: is the face on this dog a human face or a dog face?