@InnerScientist This might be good behaviour (especially on shared multiuser system)
But how often you using shared multiuser systems in 2025? In 2015? In 2010 this might be useful, but now we are using containers instead.
When you have single root user, single unpriveleged user and few service users, such behaviour is just useless. If interactive user left some services running, it’s usually intentional. And systemd requires notify about this intention every time. Why? It’s just useless complexity.

@lka1988 why systemd needs some extra compatibility? If it designed to work, it must just work, not requiring changing evertyhing around

@furycd001 @nutbutter Technically, it’s broken. If you run screen/tmux built without systemd support, it will be killed on logout. Systemd requires every program that needs daemonize link libsystemd0 only to notify systemd to keep it running. So it’s broken, but worked-around in every software which need daemonize

@Gork @nutbutter just look at /proc/1/maps on systemd-powered system :)
I do not see any reason keeping all of this in init. It might be implemented in optional lightweight services, not in single monster-binary

@MonkderVierte new ntfs driver sometimes might be unstable (usually chkufsd helps fix some errors)
Also there is fuse Paragon UFSD version (you may use ufsd binaries from paragon mounter on x86)
But ntfs-3g utilities sometimes cannot fix even trivial journal errors

@MonkderVierte @bluesheep ntfs? just use chkufsd binary from paragon mounter apk (there is static x86 binary in assets). And do not use ntfs-3g, it is slow and almost abadonned.

@NeatNit @Luffy879 also, many years ago there was closed-source ATI fglrx driver, which required disabling many kernel features. amdgpu-pro is still may contain some parts from fglrx and mention ATI technologies, but now amdgpu-pro not used anymore in most configurations…

@NeatNit @Luffy879 There is amdgpu-pro driver, but anyway it use opensource kernel driver. So it’s just ubuntu kernel little outdated

@monogram is not electron already have sandbox?

@gamer @DesertDwellingWeirdo
>discord
>desktop apps
/0
Also, packaging electron to flatpak sounds most stupid idea ever…

@Vitaly @Successful_Try543 how good is dosbox compared to wine?

@Taleya @weird it’s died with vista (last windows, supporting hardware profiles), or with end of xp support

@BagOfHeavyStones @homesweethomeMrL stolen by Trump?

@buddascrayon @gramie
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7943540.html

@dbtng You mentioned Win95, which have option to configure different shell (it allowed to select between explorer/progman shell)
But it allowed to run something in DOS mode before windows starts by editing some bat file (not sure if it’s exactly autoexec.bat)

@dbtng but win95 boots DOS first

@dbtng @gwilikers why not just adding DOOM to autoexec.bat?

@gwilikers @dbtng also it only runs on bios cd, so will not boot form usb even if mbr supported

@gwilikers @dbtng but it will not boot because of missing csm/mbr support. Need EFI version (basicly you may run doom on pure EFI without OS, as it supports everything needed and even more)

@znatgd @r00ty what about using VST in wine?
https://github.com/osxmidi/LinVst