

Oh yea, wild people. Training on the data for psycholinguistics and fingerprinting. The way they write will be how they are exposed. Ironic. Public dump and a lot of letters to employers.
nop
Oh yea, wild people. Training on the data for psycholinguistics and fingerprinting. The way they write will be how they are exposed. Ironic. Public dump and a lot of letters to employers.
US or the World? You would have to argue that with equal opportunities other countries/populations would do the same. Mental health is a issue in the US… but the world too. 2.9 billion people are still offline? They are not even here to give their opinions. Let me guess, you think that’s by choice?
Your data does not have Miranda rights and it WILL be used against you. From insurance, safety, legal and medical. Good Luck!
“I’ve seen in people” lol then talk about projection… Can you have a logical none bias conversation? You are consumed by your opinion, what you see, how you read it. You are fighting yourself. … name calling… child like behavior.
Fine “think” not sure why the salience of that word is so important to you. I called you emotional? No, I didn’t (you said above “your emotional language.” lol). How do you get emotion from the word “feel”? I can feel current… Is current emotion? sigh Once again, last part escapes me. You are connecting dots that don’t exist to make a point that is subjective. You call me arrogant but you are trying to force me to accept your analysis of myself. That’s wild arrogant. I’m just blunt. Also, when someone says feel… that’s their observation (kind of like you keep saying “your emotional language.”). You don’t get to control that. Feel me? lol Why I didn’t dismiss you calling me it. How can I? I’m not you.
“describing what you did” didn’t I just say this? Yea, go into court and describe it your way. Let me know how that works out. Not sure i follow on the rest… but sure, do whatever. I said i respectfully disagree. You insisted on telling me how you felt about my approach - never commented about you personally. Its outside of the scope of this conversation.
Never changed it. Oh, feelings because you are using personality defining terms. Meaning you feel a way about them. I think its logical. No, but you ended on a logical fallacy. You are using your own created opinion of mine… as an argument. hmm
I think you want it that way and so it was. Your feelings about what you read and how you read it is not my concern. I clearly said both are required.(reading,watching,doing… whatever… not a stupid degree) And i reject the notion this is too complex to learn over a few weeks.
Fair enough.
I disagree.
That school is required. I don’t care what you think about me. Lol
Dude, this whole “without school” thing is so silly. I think you know this site made that worthless.
I did. Reading required.
I respectfully disagree. I think that’s high education, elitist nonsense and the reason there is little to no progress being made. You all gatekeep.
I agree. Just not on the order. Why not link to a video? Look at all the videos on the site. Fuck me we are all cooked.
Never said that. Doing it a lot does. I think you have your way of learning and cant see a path outside that. Read vs. Hands on? Why not both at the same time. If you think people are this dumb… Ok but I refuse to believe that.
Dude, you don’t need biochem to do any of this. You don’t need to know a thing about biology to do a single one of these. But by the end it should sink in. You follow protocols. You think that requires a degree?
Telling people they can learn anything is arrogant? They can… They just don’t want to.
source: FBI Supervisory Special Agent and profiler James Clemente. Valid science, source and peer reviewed.