Cause it’s neither a hopeful nor inspiring future. We see the harms of social media, subscription only services, enshittification everywhere and the youth graduates into a job market where the ‘most prestigious’ companies aid in several genocides, their leaders and/or owners are pedos, Nazis or both and most important of all keep announcing the end of human labor.

What is there to be excited about?

We owe our children and grand children a better outlook on life.

I thought roundup doesn’t work on grasses? But I agree that the pixelated look suggests they couldn’t directly see the process and had to map it out beforehand and follow through row by row or something.

She must be a very unhappy woman.

The difference is that none of the charges are commonly associated with terrorism. The judge had to invent a “terrorism connection” in addition to the normal charges.

You just need to be able to reduce the risk. They all operate like this. You can’t have complete certainty, even pre-LLMs. If the answers are wrong in only 0.001% cases and gravely wrong in 0.00001% cases it may be worth the risk. You gotta be able to sue for damages after all.

The reporter’s questions weren’t even so antagonistic. [REDACTED] basically got himself into some irrational rage and quit at some point getting himself too emotional. I don’t wanna see him talking to an actual enemy…

People most worry about the hidden cameras and being filmed without noticing and consent. The tech being open wouldn’t change that, even though I agree that an open platform would be awesome.

Saying “both are the same” isn’t correct in most cases, but when it comes to class war, both parties are generally captured by capital to a similar degree.

I had no idea there were so many methods

My wife helps people with this app on a regular basis.

“Checks and balances” were a sham… for decades already. Now you just have a bad actor in a broken system.

There’s also a law against rape and pedophilia. Didn’t stop him either.

GAYMAN

This proposal would make much more sense after the bubble collapses.

Sometimes they just hire an outside consultant as a scapegoat. You can’t tell me the CEOs don’t know they need to fire people to lower operational costs. Consultants help to decide who to fire and how to package it for employees, the board, shareholders and the public. That way the CEO can cover his ass.

True that. The problem is probably my social and professional bubble that I need to get out of.

That makes a lot of sense. If the print just holds the critical parts, forget it.

I write software but I radicalized myself with Solarpunk. Now I need to find a way I can put my talents towards a tech positive future while Big Tech is turning fascist and hate against LLMs becomes nondifferentiating.

The public health boomerang

The algos don’t need to deny any or every part of a gun, but the most critical part must not be printable and it’ll already be effective.

I’m neither very experienced with firearms nor printing, maybe such a thing doesn’t exist for a gun, but I suspect there’s a few very important pieces that need to be printed a certain way or the firearm falls apart or is at least a lot less useful.

All that said, I’m generally against such limiting mechanism in any printer or compiler. Try close sourcing all compilers so they can’t create malware? Forget it.