Any attempt to abolish “capitalism” will end up with those who currently possess the capital winding up on top, and the cycle continuing.
However, if we instead abolish exploitation of specific non-renewable natural resources, we may be able to get somewhere while impacting the mechanisms that drive capitalism in the process.
Specifically it looks like the biggest increases are on urban principal arterial and and urban minor arterial. I suspect larger vehicle sizes impact the trend on a broad scale, but consideration should be kept for increasing demand for urban arterial roads, and widening existing ones as metro areas continue to sprawl at more local scales.
I’d be very interested to see the data on pedestrian deaths by road type contrasted to road infrastructure growth by type. The fact that Rural Principal arterial deaths practically disappeared around the same time that urban arterial deaths started significantly increasing could speak to a change in road classification or area designation between rural and suburban.
Specifically Rural Arterial deaths decreased by 229 from 2014 to 2015. In the same year urban principal arterial increased by 231 Urban Minor Arterial increased by 136, and rural minor collector increased by 155. While it doesn’t account for the entirety of the increase, I think there’s enough there to look at how urban arterial roads are designed.
Edit: Added specificity.
I know it’s sarcastic, but that is true universally and thus wouldn’t explain a local trend that deviates from the trends on a broader scale.
That said, I believe there was a study recently that looked at the trend in pedestrian/car fatalities, compared that to the percentage of vehicles on the road classified as trucks, and the relative size and mass of trucks over the years and found some striking correlations. I’ll see if I can dig up the study.
deleted by creator
Fantastic twist.
Solarpunk meets the hubris of man, babylon-style.
Surprisingly I feel inspired to explore this darker (pun very much intended) spin on the concept a bit.
There are two words that eviscerate the argument by demonstrating the ignorance of it (as if the fact that they need to deliberately zero out half the equation in their data isn’t enough):
Ecosystem Services.