https://keyoxide.org/692723271195C9955EC6EB51F3A4127659095327

  • 0 Posts
  • 104 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
Cake day: July 13th, 2020
  • PoorPocketsMcNewHold@lemmy.mltoOpenStreetMap community@lemmy.ml•CartesEnglish
    2·
    5 days ago

    It is based on OpenStreetMap too. It seems mostly a different map renderer + dofferent UX which tailor more to mobile. Read a bit more their blog, it seems to especially take care of replacing Qwant Maps, as an efficient Private and GAFAM efficient alternative for the French market. A web-app for maps, for the French, by the French. (It also has a blog entry about how people have Anglicized the term to juste use “Maps”, often to allude to Google Maps as a common day word, which is ineed terrible practice to do)

  • PoorPocketsMcNewHold@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.ml•Internet Archive Was Exposing User Email Addresses for Years Before Recent Breach
    4·
    3 months ago

    Exactly. I was surprised to see my unique named throw-away email being found in the leak, despite having changed it to an uniquely generated throw-away account alias in the year prior. But i don’t mind that much.

    However, bad security practices must still be pointed out regardless of it being applied to something important or large. I do still can criticize my friend decision to expose his local server at home, unsecured, even if in the grand matter of things, it is unlikely it will be exploited or impact him in any way.

    Now, the only issue having my throw-away address, is that i will have to throw it away once i start receiving spam on it. As far i know, the pirated database wasn’t shared nor necessarily conserved outside of prooving the original clowns hacktivists group involvment, outside of confirmed security analyst.

  • PoorPocketsMcNewHold@lemmy.mltoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•FluxTube | Flutter/Dart YouTube Client! | This could be the new Newpipe
    12·
    3 months ago

    Not in the usual sense, because you can still fully fork it, use it, modify it and redistribute it freely like a FOSS software.

    You may use or modify the software only for non-commercial purposes such as personal use for research, experiment, and testing for the benefit of public knowledge, personal study, private entertainment, hobby projects, amateur pursuits, or religious observance, all without any anticipated commercial application. You may distribute the software or provide it to others only if you do so free of charge for non-commercial purposes.

    The only limitation which make it non-free is :

    Notwithstanding the above, you may not remove or obscure any functionality in the software related to payment to the Licensor in any copy you distribute to others.

    I don’t really understand if it “prevent you” to remove and/or prevent the modification of the donation to FUTO part of the code. Should not prevent you from adding yours on top of it (As in, adding a prompt as in "If you want to do donate to the project, you can donate to the original app owner (DONATE TO FUTO) or the maintainer of the fork you are using (DONATE TO THE MAINTAINER).) And the obvious limitation of making derivative work of it, non-free of course.

    Also, they do reserve themselves rights to abrodge the license for those who abridge it, which i don’t know how legally useful it may be, for license violations compared to protecting the GPL licenses from violations for example.

    tl;dr : Seems FOSS to me, as long as :

    • You don’t try to make it non-free
    • You don’t remove the donation to FUTO part of the app