I ran this through google translate and got “I’m looking forward to seeing you there”, but I don’t understand what that means in the context of my comment that this is a reply too, is maybe google translate a bad option for translation? I’m not sure what a better translator is and I’m open to a better one if I can get a link for it.

我用谷歌翻译试了一下，结果显示是“我很期待在那里见到你”，但我不太明白这句话放在我原本那条评论的语境下是什么意思——难道谷歌翻译不太好用吗？我也不清楚哪个翻译工具更好，如果能提供链接的话，我很乐意尝试一下更好的工具。

The Capitalists had been well prepared in advance, they were pushing and pushing, surrounding Russia with missles, ETC, such that it was only a matter of time before Russia would need to act to protect itself, since the populace of Capitalist countries had been successfully kept completely in the dark about that building situation, they were well prepared to paint Russia’s actions as out of nowhere, sudden and vile “those evil evil Russians”, they showed manufactured atrocity propaganda and went into overdrive with, stuff like, taking things that the azov/keiv regime did to donbas or simular, and passing it off as stuff Russia did to the ukraine for example.

On top of that, the more emotionally supported a belief is, the more painful it is to acknowledge that it is wrong, since the atrocity propaganda had so traumatized liberals, and since they got so drawn into emotionally supporting what turns out to be a fascist state color revolutioned in by the US, facing just how badly they were made the fool, and their emotions played like a fiddle, for many liberals, facing that is brutal, so they go into denial instead, it is one reason why they may support the Palestinians, but condemn Russia.

It wasn’t long ago that I was reading news out of China about popular support in China for Iran’s fight against US Imperialism, they (people, not the state) were trying to send financial aid to help the Iranian’s against the US that has been bombing them, 1.4 Billion people is a lot of people, there are going to be liberals, there are going to be all kinds of socialists full of all kinds of errors, making all kinds of mistakes, that does not however mean they are a majority. Also important, it is not a popularity contest, something is not true or not based on popularity, unless that something is “is this thing popular?”, that applies to the non-imperialist status of Iran and Russia, even if there are wrong ideas out there that say otherwise, as also that is applies to the Science of Socialism, which is not determined by popularity on whether or not it is true, unless the question itself is of if this thing is popular.

Edit: Seems Cowbee is probably right with it being a translation issue, as “the truth is on the side of the proletariat, not on the side of any government or capitalist.” doesn’t seems to go against what we are saying, or the concept of critical support.

“the truth is on the side of the proletariat, not on the side of any government or capitalist.”

China is actually working on all three at once: wearable, under the skull but not in the brain (think closer electrode, without skull, skin and hair in the way), and in the brain, each of the three has pros and cons, so it makes sense to work on all as that way you can take only the amount of risk as the need for the device justifies.

There is that and then there is the fact that the US and co almost certainly wants a literal Mind-Control device no matter what they claim, but China actually wants the Mind to remain in Control rather than Controlled, and the focus is on medical advancements for human benefit. The US will charge an arm and a leg for such, but medical purposes (or rather Medical Expenses) is secondary to how the Capitalists use anything and everything to maintain control over humanity and remove threats to their hegemonic control of the world.

An example of the US use case is in how they took “Alligator Alcatraz” Concentration Camp victims and used them for Neuralink experimentation.

Edit: I guess it would be more accurate to say that control and ending perceived threats is primary when in emergency and profit secondary, but when not in emergency IE when Capitalism doesn’t feel threatened, then profit remains primary instead, a Dialectic between control and profit with one switching with the other for primary status depending on sense of threat.

Edit 2: And since Capitalists are not a hivemind of identical drones, some will be more or less feeling threatened than others at any given time, and so while some are ringing alarm bells and throwing everything at the wall to protect against perceived threats, even at the expense of profit, others will take advantage of such a situation to drive profit higher, even when it gets in the way and makes the crisis of Capitalism worse, and so they fight amongst themselves over profiteering or measures to maintain control, and we all stand back and watch and laugh at the parasite clown show as they can’t fully organize themselves over their own greed and short sightedness, and the CPC of the PRC plays them like a fiddle while the US deludes themselves into thinking they are still winning with endless copes as the empire continues to degrade. HA HA HA HAA!

Chinese news: hey, US, if you do this thing it’ll backfire and hurt you, maybe don’t do that. US: You’re not the boss of me! “Does thing” “hurts self” US: I just didn’t do it hard enough! “Does thing more” “hurts self more”

It’s very funny to watch. Very “tis but a flesh wound” kind of energy.

It’s the accumulation of a quantity before the point in which a transformation in quality occurs, the conditions are growing more favorable for actual Socialism, and as more burn out on fake “socialism” they will be more receptive to the real deal. Behind the growth of “socialism” there are Marxist Leninists slipstreaming to catch those thrown off the “socialist” bus by disillusionment.

It’s not a binary, “is” or “isn’t” thing, the socdems represent the fear of the ruling class to appease the masses and cool revolutionary energy before it boils over, they are a weather vein that is showing that the winds are changing direction.

There are more decades in weeks ahead of us, even if the pendulum sometimes swings back to weeks in decades. (or at least seemingly)