I want to make the point that it doesn’t have anything to do with skin color, that is a made up thing by people who don’t like it. Coming to Sweden and getting to stay is not a human right. That applies to everybody no matter where you’re from. So no, I do not think wanting people to remigrate makes the party far-right.

Would you like to elaborate? There’s is nothing wrong with not liking it, but that does not put the party into some far-right category that people seem to be making up.

There is nothing wrong with wanting people to assimilate or get sent back. Integration does not work with certain cultures which we have seen for the last 20 years. If you come to Sweden you are a guest and you should behave like one, right? Then if you do intend to stay you should be supportive of our values and our way of life. There is also no denying that certain people in office hold plain racist views and we have to work hard on kicking those people out of any institutions we have.
So a difference of opinion in this case is what to do with people who come here that don’t contribute to society, don’t follow our societal norms, and break our laws. It doesn’t have anything to do with race.

What I do agree with is how they have really messed up with some cases in regards to people growing up in Sweden and then getting sent to a country they have never been in, but that is on the people in the government for not doing their job correctly. Remigration does not have to mean going all-in or doing nothing, there is a nice middle ground where you can do things on a case-by-case basis.

And nobody has said that, you’re just making stuff up. So just because you disagree, are you not going to have an honest discussion?

Well you should not believe everything you read in articles. Even reputable outlets will be wrong when they write about something outside of their area of expertise. I think most people in here will just read the headline and some comments saying “far-right!” and believe that is true. Go to the Wikipedia pages for the Örebro Party and read them. I’ll link both the Swedish and English pages for you so you can compare them. I’ll also link to their own website, it is only in Swedish so you’ll have to translate it yourself. But you’ll see that nothing is out of the ordinary and the whole thing is blown out of proportions.

https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96rebropartiet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96rebro_Party
https://orebropartiet.se/

Far-right doesn’t mean anything these days, it’s just something people default to saying when they’re not really interested in debating political views(God forbid you have a slightly different view).

Do you people actually know anything about this party or are you just getting your panties in a twist over a nothingburger?

I could say that any party in the Swedish government is controversial, does that mean you are going to boycott everything Swedish now?

I don’t see any hate speech and I tried looking for anyone questioning another groups right to live. Is the group thing connected to Charlie Kirk?
I did see some blog posts from David Heinemeier Hansson that could be seen as controversial, but that’s just it, controversial, people have different opinions on topics.

Looking at those tweets I would say it is way overblown. People act like it’s the end of the world if there is a slight disagreement.

This whole ”controversy” surrounding Ladybird is such a nothing burger, people are just looking for an excuse to be offended. Is everyone you disagree with either right wing or nazis?

Intressant artikel, den hade jag missat! Det jag inser med mitt påstående om en utomstående instans är att det också blir svårt att kontrollera för vems räkning beslut klubbas igenom eller skjuts ner.

Man vill ju inte ha ett fall där näringslivet har lyckats kuppa sig in och säger att ett dåligt beslut är bra, för att det på kort sikt skulle generera mer intäkter för företag men i längden bli sämre för privatpersoner🤷‍♂️

Sen så borde jag kanske följa IMY bättre, jag måste erkänna att jag kanske ibland bara gör egna antaganden för att mitt tankesätt är ”regeringen bestämmer vilket uppdrag myndigheten har -> regeringen kan köra över myndigheten och göra som den vill oavsett”

Tycker det är rätt sjukt hur vi i Sverige kan vara hyfsat starka på IT-sidan som så litet land men samtidigt ha politiker som har noll koll på hur något inom IT faktiskt fungerar.
Nästan så att vi skulle behöva en instans utanför våra myndigheter som har sista ordet när det kommer till cybersäkerhet.