Each of the 13 justices gets a 13 year term, each justice could serve up to two terms, consecutive or not,
Absolutely not. You NEED it to be one term, because judges should never have to rely on approval of others for their jobs. The only reason they should be able to be removed after appointment is a severe ethics violation.
too many people to vote for means no one knows anything about who they’re voting for.
I think some appointments are fine, but they should never be soley appoint able by 1 branch/person. I3, congress should be able to put forth their own cabinet options type of thing
It’s far worse than that. The judiciary is able to be fired by the executive branch and that simply should not be possible.
I feel the checks on the supreme court is close. I think with 18 year ish terms to replace 1 every every 2 years consistently would work
Some people are shit at spelling. That’s damn near ableist behavior to suggest that tbh
Because we need more housing, too. Building out mixed use multi family residential is important
If you’re the gold store people are selling gold to, you make more money revealing this
If you’re in intelligence.services, security should be a priority. You can also just have phones at work.
Holy meaningless statement
They could literally just leave their phones at home.
The fact that the french don’t even have basic countermeasures to prevent this is as hilarious as it is depressing . It wouldn’t even be hard.
Sounds pretty based to do that to a carrier ngl
“making policy”. Yes, the mayor. Who makes the laws. That mayor making policies.
You don’t know what a theocracy is.
Of course they aren’t. But usa is not a theocracy. It’s not run by a head of church nor anything close
The usa is a fascist state. Not a the3orcacy
Interesting how the price drops so much when you just ban renting apartments out :P
Is theocracies bring trash racism?
For the comment higher towards you I really did mean that as a general clarification. I would’ve worded it more strongly otherwise. I wasn’t entirely sure if you realized it or not given your wording, so I wanted to make sure less familiar people reading on that were more clear.
The cherry picking comment was not to you, it was to their person it’s replied to. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just misread the comment chain
They get mad at the very idea that people can work together and successfully create change, despite numerous historical examples. It’s actively immature to be wholly cynical