And I have never heard that phrase before. Maybe it’s a regional with these?

While I like Steve Shives generally, I don’t like the title. Now, I haven’t watched this video yet so I don’t know if he differentiates, but from I read in the comments it’s (mostly) about Dawkins and Pinker (whom I don’t know). Most activists who support trans communities and the LGBTQIA±movement are atheists though.

Quite the same topic (Dawkins’ transphobia) is this video by Genetically Modified Skeptic: Why I Turned Down Working With Richard Dawkins

(I don’t want to take anything away from Steve Shives though. I’m not saying ”Watch this video instead“, I just want to add.)

I think they meant ”No gods, no heroes, no idols“ though.

Na. The Nazis most probably will be strongest opposition party, but the government will be populist.

So I looked it up and I have to update my statement before.

First, one can also just have their gender entry outright deleted.

Secondly, naming conventions are the same as for baby names:

Generally, first names have to correspond to the new gender entry:

1. Who chooses the male gender can use a name or names that are purely male ore both male and female.
2. Who chooses the female gender can use a name or names that are purely female or both female and male.
3. And who chooses the gender „diverse“or to delete their gender entry has free choice among male and female names
4. For all genders, the chosen names have to be actual first names.

(Source translation by me because I was too stupid to realize there’s an English version)

Unfortunately, despite the actual progress this law certainly demonstrates, it also shows there’s still both a binary way to think about gender and certain expectations linked to gender well seated in the minds of lawmakers. Nonetheless, it’s a lot better than what we had before.

I’m not sure, tbh. I think that only applies to baby names, but I’ll be sure and check later when I’m home

I invite y’all to Germany. We have legally recognised three genders plus changing your name and gender entry has just become easier (although politicians of the most likely coming up government said they want to reverse the latter, though that party is not exactly known for keeping their word).

If you want to avoid every movie or show where a bigoted or otherwise very critical person or company is heavily involved in the production, the range of movies or shows would shrink drastically. So instead of not watching I pirate. The bigots don’t make a profit off of me and we’re all good.

Well, the show might benefit from me pirating that thing. I do have a right to flip the bird towards TERFS express my personal view ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

That’s what I don’t understand about many U.S. lefts. I do understand that the Democrats ain’t perfect and that they have some weird positions. But your elective system (which is kind of screwed from the start anyway) only has two possible outcomes, dems or reps. And the two of them are not equally bad, so why take away votes from the by far not that bad option, strengthening the really bad option?

What a coincidence. I saw Serious Sam on sale earlier today.

deleted by creator

I personally like emblems, icons and heraldry on flags. Without them, flags are often enough just bars of colors.

I’very been to a psychosomatic rehab for the last weeks and the actually had restrooms marked with the standard “male/female” stick figures but each restroom also had a stick figure on it’s sign being half “male” and half “female”.

Props were given.

I know about the alternatives. That wasn’t the question though.

Why can’t you just bring the reasons you think are important?

Vice versa for me tho

Care to elaborate? Like, why, maybe provide some resources, etc.