

I’m sure her angle is there is a difference between defending a website’s history and defending the mere act of happening to be on it.
You also answered your own confusion about the free speech thing.
I’m sure her angle is there is a difference between defending a website’s history and defending the mere act of happening to be on it.
You also answered your own confusion about the free speech thing.
I’ve never seen any censorship on there.
Well, what is it then? And what gives you whatever answer to that you have?
Also, like I said, impersonation is common there.
That’s not them you are linking to on that site. People pretend to be other people on there all the time, especially in subtle ways like hyperlinking as if they are on here, as it allows them to not have to say they are lying. The fact they in turn link to the KiwiFarms page isn’t proof either; the two users are said to have just known about each other.
I checked, they’re not a member of it. What you’re using to say they are a member are red herrings.
I spoke to the admins who most rudely banned you, and it turns out you aren’t banned in the way it seems (also keeping in mind that the whole point of the fediverse is to design the several instances to be philosophically against the existence of bans, which implies that the notion that any of these incidents towards you “count as bans” is wrong, and that your haters who don’t know this don’t know how the fediverse was intended to work), and they gave me permission to tell you (they wanted to tell you via Discord server, since they know you are big on that) that you may be considered unbanned in the eyes of the masses in the sense that you have permission to sign up again as MissKiwi as a part of the process to clean up the mess, since the modlogs now bear indication that what happened to you was veiled discrimination against your autism. They plan to ensure you’re transferred over and then remove your current traces because it’s easier.
Well shit.
hides in corner
Here is my answer to the question: I learned that my city tried to fine NASA for property damage caused by a rocket in the 90’s.
This doesn’t have to be revealing, you know. Hence the “obscure” part.
It would be neat if there was an instance. Stoicism is the OG.
Future ancestors? What are they, time travelers?
That quote literally cannot be found anywhere.
The whole defense for hate speech is free speech, but I’m guessing she doesn’t mean hate speech. You’ll have to ask her if I am wrong if you think I might be.
Sources say she is on there specifically to monitor the site when they mention her friends, with some in-between dialogue which has her use the site vocabulary in a tone that isn’t meant to be synonymous with her agreeing with their extremism.
May I also remind you that Lemmy not only advocates assassination but even sponsors it (not in the money sense)?