I feel like he’ll actually be well received by other inmates if it comes to that, at least
I feel like he’ll actually be well received by other inmates if it comes to that, at least
Wow, truly a man after my own heart
Remember kids, if you see the guy who shot and killed the UCH CEO with named bullets: no you didn’t.
“Rot in poverty” -UHC policy
I’ve been saying this for years 🤣
So I used to work in the industry, and everything you mentioned was the rhetoric used by people who only ever did the most basic surface level investigation. Now I’m not trying to say I don’t think you’ve done any research at all or anything, but I am suggesting you look further into the situation. Technically calling it “vapor” is very misleading, and now, when most vapes are disposable with no replaceable parts, and the liquid being held entirely in a wicking material rather than a tank or pod (which have their own issues, plastics being exposed to high heat, etc.), the “just replace the coil” line of operation doesn’t apply. And even when it did, most people who came to the shop I worked at would push their coils WAY past the point of safety. The last point, though, still generally holds true, IN THE RIGHT CIRCUMSTANCES. Circumstances which most casual users don’t bother maintaining. If you’re a heavy smoker, vaping is generally less harmful, and that’s about the only way that rhetoric checks out.
The entire thing is pretty nasty. 0mg nicotine liquid still turns into weird aerosols and the coils still corrode, releasing harmful metal particles into said aerosol.
Nah unfortunately Harris is pro-Israel
I’m not completely sure but I think quenching MRI magnets is pretty permanent
I see what of which you did there
New sci-fi apocalypse timeline unlocked: super-coral takes over the planet
I am 100% with the spirit of this statement. But people need to stop overusing “of which” and “in which”, literally even Matt Mercer (who I assume is largely responsible for the recent popularization of this turn of phrase) uses it wrong half the time. In this instance, it should be either: “in which you are a part” or “which you are a part of” but instead they used both, presumably in an attempt to sound sophisticated, at which they failed. Which is unfortunate because I love a good lambasting of scientology
You wouldn’t download a sous vide
Well what was it made of?
Trading liver damage for COPD. Wcgw
Yeah I guess I’d be ok with that. I may have lost faith in our judicial system to get that shit done
Let them earn their Darwin awards
What?! Florida is evolving! … Congratulations! Your Florida evolved into Ocean!
Sync ftw