Why not both?
Are you implying that we should only do good things if they are the most good things in existence? Like, I shouldn’t have an electric car because planes exist? Please enlighten me.
Why not both?
Are you implying that we should only do good things if they are the most good things in existence? Like, I shouldn’t have an electric car because planes exist? Please enlighten me.
If everyone gets to be immortal, imagine never being able to get rid of dictators. Putin’s 600th won election.
People in the future wouldn’t be allowed to have children, Earth will be filled to the brim with very old people and very few new ideas.
Exactly, like if someone doesn’t want kids I wouldn’t want to be their child, let them not have them
Where I live you pretty much cannot adopt if you’re past 40, except when someone put their kid in their last will for you.
You guys have cigarette stores?
I’m not the one you talked to but isn’t it better to receive assistance in dying so that the experience is less traumatic for friends or relatives of the dead? For example, they don’t have to see their loved one inject themselves or whatnot.
Plus, it comes with the benefit of not having to transport the body if it was a suicide at home, not having to stress about the lethal cocktail and if it contained the right amounts of drugs or whatever.
It doesn’t say much, but I would prefer it a whole lot that a person that I am close to chooses the assisted suicide. And I would much rather be strapped to someone when skydiving.
(Sorry, english is not my main language)
So the problem is the hypocrisy of the news empire, not an idiotic thesis?