Why did this change? Was it a greed thing?

    • CeeBee@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      It would buffer to a temp folder. Storing it all in RAM would be pointless.

      • Acters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        Some people’s internet and hard drives would be crippled by this. It’s to promote multitasking mostly. There are ways to download videos that I won’t get into, but it is possible if you desperately want to buffer the whole video. I do think it’s stupid to lock offline video downlaods behind a subscription paywall, but I am small fry and will do what I can.

        • CeeBee@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Not at all. If your hard drive would get crippled by a few GBs then I don’t know what to tell you. When the playback is stopped, and the application closed, then the temporary files are discarded.

          The argument about bandwidth usage is accurate though. I didn’t make sense to buffer the whole video when it might not be watched anyways.