GPG is just a mess overall, only place I think it makes sense are DNMs
I do not agree, sorry. GPG is a marvel, and I’ve been using it for many years in
pass, Git, and Thunderbird, and it’s been always working like a charm.It’s not about whether GPG seemingly works, if it’s whether it is a suitable tool for what it’s advertised, and the answer within the expert community is no
Thank you for the response!
There are many haters, indeed, or just infant, indifferent, disrespectful people who express their thoughts online venting on some project, or someone else but not them.
There are other post, of course, where someone, as “stef”, shared their thought on public at some random “conference”, too:
- https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/blog/posts/on_pgp.htmlYet, have you actually had issues yourself with it GnuPG, PGP? For how long, if any? Were your reports solved? How fast?
Are proposed solutions perfect, those proposed by the blog author (who is unknown by some umbrella name of some random organization)? Wormhole, Signal etc.?
The Signal, a solution for everything encrypted over a wire, really?
What about Git, pass, Email, PDF, office documents?
What about your local dear encryption?The Signal, a solution for everything encrypted over a wire, really?
What about Git, pass, Email, PDF, office documents?\Did you read the post? Because that’s not what it said.
Got commits can be signed with ssh keys nowadays. Files can be encrypted with age.
Don’t encrypt email, it’s a waste of time.
What about your local dear encryption?
?
