• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      A base-12 metric system would be absolutely gorgeous. Geometry and trigonometry would be greatly simplified with a duodecimal unit circle. Our 360-degree circle is a truly ugly hack to make geometry play nice with a decimal number system.

      Our base-10 number system would be as ugly to a duodecimal society as a base-7 system would be to us.

      • blindsight@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        On the last point, a better comparison would be base 6 or base 14.

        10 = 2 × 5
        6 = 2 × 3
        14 = 2 × 7

        Or maybe a better way of thinking about it is the percentage of numbers that divide nicely in the base, as a percentage.

        Base 10 has 2, 5, 10 = 30%

        So maybe base 3 is the closest, at 33% of numbers being easily divisible.

        Either way, 7 is a significantly worse base than 10.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Base-6 wouldn’t be bad at all. “100” in base 6 is 36 in base 10. Their metricated unit circle would have three times as many “degree” divisions as we have hours on a clock.

          Base 7 or 14 would require something akin to the sexagesimal abstraction layer we use to make base-10 play nice with angles.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      but why? you’ll still measure things in football fields, elephants or “large boulders” so it won’t affect you much

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I especially love it when they use the weight of an airplane as a comparison. “It’s as heavy as a Boeing 747”. Even if someone had an intuition about the weight of something that large, they would probably be wrong because aircraft are relatively light for their size, it helps when you need to fly. Everything in a plane is made to be as light as possible, so nothing on board of it would weigh as much as the non-aircraft equivalent you’d be familiar with.

      • snaprails@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Excuse me but the correct SI units for length and area are double-decker buses and Waleses respectively ☺️

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just wait until they find out public schools are giving their children dihydrogen monoxide without asking for parental approval.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s found everywhere. They’ve detected DHMO even in the deepest parts of the ocean, and it’s been estimated that every single human being alive has at least some of it in their bloodstream. We’re fucked.

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gotcha questions like this (eg “should we ban dihydromonoxide”) are supposed to show us not to jump to conclusions, but I’m guessing the people voting no on this one aren’t taking much away from it

  • Ulijin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In fairness the question is open to interpretation. They don’t specify if they mean western or eastern Arabic numerals.

    As schools in the west already teach western, the people responding could justifiably deduce that the question is referring to eastern.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the Eastern Arabic numbers are the same as the western ones except that the Arabs call them Indian numbers