• rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s about the suffering. These chickens have horrible lives. What’s the point of killing less chickens if they suffer horribly?

    Better to kill more chickens that don’t suffer while they’re alive.

    And better yet to eliminate factory farming altogether. But one step at a time.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s still more chickens who still very much suffer a lot, just a little less in one specific way. It is not accurate at all to say that they don’t suffer while they are alive along with suffering while being killed. It potentially worsens a lot of issue by increasing numbers. From the earlier article

      Our results indicate that, if raised in CAFOs, a shift to slower-growing Rangers may increase crowding and related welfare concerns including increased footpad dermatitis [7], jostling, conflicts and potentially infection risk [14], and thus may translate to a decrease in aggregate welfare at scale. A shift to individual better-welfare chicken breeds aims to lessen bone, heart and disease issues in present Ross birds, but even in non-CAFO production systems, slower-growing breeds may still experience other negative welfare conditions such as emotional and physical stress, disease, predation, injury and premature mortality, as well as distressing transport and slaughter practices