I’ve always been frustrated about film scanning being locked behind a paywall or generic AI slop. I’ve tried to make this as system agnostic as I can. Please give me feedback so that I can improve this article. Thanks in advance!

  • Sem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    It is very cool but … very “professional” I would say . I mean just the gear… It is quite an expensive if not say more. Maybe you can add a couple of words about more “entry-level” setup. For example I’m still on relatively chip Plustek 8100 + one old version of VueScan I bought five years ago.

      • Sem@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes… Or even some overview of possible methods. Even a top level one would be nice, because there are a lot of possible options with gear and software.

  • Ⓜ3️⃣3️⃣ 🌌@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Thanks for sharing, it looks to me great already. And nicely detailed so not only a screenshot collection 👍

    I see you go through the pain of inverting then tuning curves, as it should be. I only do B&W and I dislike this step… the sooner an automatic tuning does it for me the better…

    Keep us updated if you continue working on it 🙏

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Thanks for sharing! I personally use Darktable and negadoctor, but honestly this doesn’t look too complicated either. Sometimes it’s very hard to get consistent results. Usually there’s not one set of settings to gets me satisfying results for all photos on a roll (usually due to tinted lighting, under/overexposure, etc). I tried using the first part of the roll, where there’s usually a fully exposed and fully unexposed part, for tuning the initial values. But this also doesn’t always deliver consistent results. Usually it’s a lot of back and forth between different photos.