The conclusion, which seems like basic morality towards fellow living beings :
So :
- 1) The Court has jurisdiction to give the requested advisory opinion ;
- 2) The Court agrees to give that opinion ;
- 3.a) Israel must ensure that palestinians have essential supplies(, food, water, shelter, medicine, etc.) ;
- 3.b) It must facilitate all humanitarian relief operations, not obstruct them ;
- 3.c) It must protect medical personnel ;
- 3.d) It must not deport palestinians ;
- 3.e) It must allow the Red Cross visits to detained palestinians ;
- 3.f) It must not use starvation of civilians as a method of warfare ;
- 4) It must fulfil the human rights of palestinians ;
- 5) It must cooperate with the UN and its agencies, including UNRWA ;
- 6) It must ensure respect for UN privileges&immunities, under article 105 of the UN Charter ;
- 7) It must respect the inviolability of UN property, including those of UNRWA ;
- 8) It must respect the privileges&immunities of UN officials and experts on mission in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
On one side, i wouldn’t want such imperfect/corruptible u.n. or i.c.j. to decide for the states, with their thousands of rules, it’s too dangerous(, but i still desire a handful of world rules, and a world army[1]).
On the other, by choosing to reject for decades the palestinian ‘offer to live side-by-side’/‘justified demand that the Holy Lands don’t only belong to one abrahamic religion’, Israel is digging its own grave, and i hope that it will be given some area of lands in the west after its warranted destruction.
Also, Francesca Albanese new report reveals how states actively enabled Israel’s oppression of palestinians.
[1] : Since it’s also linked to Venezuela, and any other country wishing to follow through, i’d like to develop.
This world army could only intervene in two cases :
- if a state refuses to pay the tax required to maintain that world army ;
- if a state invades another(, this only deals with overt operations, the covert ones being treated by some ideally incorruptible international tribunal)
That army would never be able to intervene for civil wars, or alleged genocides against separatists(, especially if we assume that a tribunal can only confirm covert operations and not stop them), or any other cases, i suppose.
Well, i.d.k. if i’m missing cases.
That world army is sent for each natural disaster to help the local population for free, as long as the state concerned agrees.
And there’s a case for retrieving individuals responsible for grave crimes abroad if they won’t stop acting.
It’s worth thinking about deeply before creating or joining a system that won’t allow secession/‘refusing to pay the ensuing tax’, hence sacrificing the possibility of disunity for the benefit of ensured diversity/security.
The link with Venezuela and its communes is that a nation could implement internally how it imagines that a world government should be to obtain the most unity and the most diversity at the same time. If leaders indeed do not follow, they just haven’t found yet how to experiment successfully in their new approach, and sanctions clearly don’t help.
However, like palestinians for israelis, they may benefit from informing americans of the reality of the situation somehow ; if advertisements are forbidden, then an illegal campaign in mailboxes, or on the internet, or by calling, bots as well since everyone’s doing it. It could cost billions each year though.
The conclusion, which seems like basic morality towards fellow living beings :
So :
- 1) The Court has jurisdiction to give the requested advisory opinion ;
- 2) The Court agrees to give that opinion ;
- 3.a) Israel must ensure that palestinians have essential supplies(, food, water, shelter, medicine, etc.) ;
- 3.b) It must facilitate all humanitarian relief operations, not obstruct them ;
- 3.c) It must protect medical personnel ;
- 3.d) It must not deport palestinians ;
- 3.e) It must allow the Red Cross visits to detained palestinians ;
- 3.f) It must not use starvation of civilians as a method of warfare ;
- 4) It must fulfil the human rights of palestinians ;
- 5) It must cooperate with the UN and its agencies, including UNRWA ;
- 6) It must ensure respect for UN privileges&immunities, under article 105 of the UN Charter ;
- 7) It must respect the inviolability of UN property, including those of UNRWA ;
- 8) It must respect the privileges&immunities of UN officials and experts on mission in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
On one side, i wouldn’t want such imperfect/corruptible u.n. or i.c.j. to decide for the states, with their thousands of rules, it’s too dangerous(, but i still desire a handful of world rules, and a world army[1]).
On the other, by choosing to reject for decades the palestinian ‘offer to live side-by-side’/‘justified demand that the Holy Lands don’t only belong to one abrahamic religion’, Israel is digging its own grave, and i hope that it will be given some area of lands in the west after its warranted destruction.
Also, Francesca Albanese new report reveals how states actively enabled Israel’s oppression of palestinians.
[1] : Since it’s also linked to Venezuela, and any other country wishing to follow through, i’d like to develop.
This world army could only intervene in two cases :
- if a state refuses to pay the tax required to maintain that world army ;
- if a state invades another(, this only deals with overt operations, the covert ones being treated by some ideally incorruptible international tribunal)
That army would never be able to intervene for civil wars, or alleged genocides against separatists(, especially if we assume that a tribunal can only confirm covert operations and not stop them), or any other cases, i suppose.
Well, i.d.k. if i’m missing cases.
That world army is sent for each natural disaster to help the local population for free, as long as the state concerned agrees.
And there’s a case for retrieving individuals responsible for grave crimes abroad if they won’t stop acting.
It’s worth thinking about deeply before creating or joining a system that won’t allow secession/‘refusing to pay the ensuing tax’, hence sacrificing the possibility of disunity for the benefit of ensured diversity/security.
The link with Venezuela and its communes is that a nation could implement internally how it imagines that a world government should be to obtain the most unity and the most diversity at the same time. If leaders indeed do not follow, they just haven’t found yet how to experiment successfully in their new approach, and sanctions clearly don’t help.
However, like palestinians for israelis, they may benefit from informing americans of the reality of the situation somehow ; if advertisements are forbidden, then an illegal campaign in mailboxes, or on the internet, or by calling, bots as well since everyone’s doing it. It could cost billions each year though.