Apparently this is an unpopular opinion among feminists. If feminism is about equality for everyone, it needs to address that. As an example, LGBTQ+ was extended many times to cover everyone in the community, and that’s the right thing to do. There isn’t just L and everyone repeats “Oh! Lesbians are for rights for everyone, no need to update that”

I don’t know what the new name should be, but it should cover gender equality for everyone.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I completely agree: the name has been compromised. Haters have successfully turned it into something negative. Perhaps it will get the respect it’s due if it can leave some baggage behind.

    I was one of many who fell for the propaganda about feminists being man haters and wanting superiority, and I’m sure some do. However most women I know who claim to be feminists are so in the egalitarian sense. They just want equal rights and opportunity. My own eye opening was when we had our first kid. At the time my company had no paternity leave. It was a group of feminists at work who raised a stink (unasked) to try to get that changed, that men also deserve some time off for the birth of their child

    • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I don’t think it’s because of the name. The people against the movement won’t like it no matter what you call it. Like Suffragettes(back in the day,) Pride, LGBTQ+, Black Lives Matter, DEI, and hell, depending on your crowd, even “Equality” and “Empathy” are sneered at.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think it’s a similar argument to “woke”. The original meaning was a good thing but the term has so much baggage now that people abandoned it