The planet could see 2 degrees Celsius of warming by the end of the decade.

🤦🤦🤦

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    No it isn’t. That’s a nonsensical statement that is at odds with both human nature and climate science. People need to believe that there is hope or they will not act.

    So far, there are always survivors of the mass extinctions. No indication that this one will be different.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m sure that’ll be very comforting for the 99% of humans that die in that case.

      You know how we adapt? By changing now.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Because saying things like, “I trust our kids” is part of how climate denialism was sold to Boomers and Gen X. We tried the low pressure approach. It’s time to panic people.

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            But this is not and has never been part of climate denialism messaging. In fact, the type of false statements you have been making (e.g. 99% of people dying—there is absolutely no scientific basis for this idea) are increasingly amplified by denialists to convince everyone that it’s too late to do anything.

            Research on this topic supports that a hopeful outlook not only does not reduce climate action, it helps to encourage it by reducing a sense that actions won’t have any real effect: https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cobi.14020

            We found that hope and optimism did not undermine perceptions about serious of the threat or likelihood of action. In fact, hope was associated with stronger threat appraisal and indicators of action. These findings provide important support for proponents of hope and optimism and a counter to those who suggest that positive states undermine recognition of conservation challenges.

            So the science supports neither the idea that our children are doomed nor that holding a realistic but hopeful view of the future will prevent people from acting. In fact it is the exact thing people need to empower them to act.