tsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoI respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful projectslrpnk.netimagemessage-square71linkfedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down18
arrow-up150arrow-down1imageI respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful projectslrpnk.nettsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square71linkfedilink
minus-squarefruitycoder@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 years agoNix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better “universal” packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution. Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoSheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoNp. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)
Nix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better “universal” packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution.
Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.
Also than*
MR accepted. Thx!
Sheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.
Thx!
Np. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)