• Franklin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Not surprising they’ve been social marketing with corporate accounts and purchased accounts for years because the know it’s effective.

    This is just the natural evolution of that.

    • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah this is one instance where I don’t care that the human bots are being replaced with AI bots. I mean, it’s even worse than before, but those “workers” don’t have my support here.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Defederate/ban them, defederate instances that don’t adequately stop them from their instances.

      • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        That might work for now, but AI bots can easily create more content faster than human moderators can go through. We will need mechanisms to prove humanness.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Another strategy might be to demand a minimum content quality. Whether trash comes from humans or bots, it’s still trash.

      • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yea, it will be a hard problem to solve. There’s no good solutions right now. Hopefully someone with the creativity and skill will come up with something.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      We are a community. The community will find a way as we can do anything. We have faith of the heart and everything.

      • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yea, but AI bots do it at an unprecedented scale. The price of generating bullshit is practically 0. There is already cheap AI content every where and people are already getting tired of it. It’s true that human actors has done something similar for a long time, but now AI will make the process so easy that AI junk will be everywhere. Look at Google search results, it’s already filled with blogspam generated by AI. Blogspam was a problem before, but now it’s insufferable. Cheap midjourney “art” is showing up in search results even when you search for real classic artist, you get these ugly AI copies. Generative AI is the ultimate bullshit and spam machine.

      • Tregetour@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Bots aren’t the problem. You mistake the tool for its operator by cursing a bot. If I had a specific purpose for a bot, I’d use one. The difference between my using a bot and a clickfarmer using a bot is that I wouldn’t treat Lemmy instances as a resource to be exploited (and ultimately ruined). Such an attitude would inform the how and the what behind my bot use.

        The problem as always comes back to bad incentives, bad design and bad behaviour.

  • Deebster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m not a regular there any more, but I feel like there’s more “natural” spam posts nowadays. They’re not natural enough that they haven’t prompted me to check the account’s post history (all mention product x, of course).

    Edit: e.g. this one

    If this is an example of the AI, it’s not very good.

    • eveninghere@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      LLMs don’t generate that sort of templated response for conversation (although they do for software code).

      It’s more likely a traditional ad, using some classical algorithms perhaps.