A study recently published in the peer-reviewed American Psychologist journal claims that a combination of facial recognition and artificial intelligence technology can accurately assess a person’s political orientation by simply looking at that person’s blank, expressionless face. Read more…
I don’t believe it.
That’s the cool thing about peer review research, it doesn’t give a fuck if you believe in it or not.
Oh shit, that’s right!! I forgot peer reviewed research have never been wrong before about anything in the history of science. My bad, dude.
These are some good papers to focus on for how to smell academic bullshit.
Machine learning assisted phrenology!
History feels more and more cyclical every fucking day, I swear.
Yeah. I actually didn’t have “bring back Phrenology” on my “systemic regression into the dark ages” bingo card.
Bumps on one’s skull is a far cry from facial features. We humans intake a wealth of data from faces.
Facial expressions, sure. But this study measured still photos from volunteers.
As a human I feel like I can make a damned good guess as to someone’s politics by looking at them. We’re really, really good at picking up clues from faces, even if we’re not conscious as to why we’re getting those clues.
Despite being an avid shooter, I’m very liberal. No one I’ve talked to, or been around, regarding guns has ever assumed I’m conservative. In fact, I’ve noticed they’re damned careful to dance around politics around me.
Maybe it’s the long hair? OTOH, I can be red necked out in my attire and holding an AR-15 and people still won’t being up conservative views. And I’m in a very conservative area where it’s safe to assume a guy that looks like me is a Trump voter.
I could see an AI correlating 10,000 facial cues to make an accurate guess. Interesting to think on.
just because ai does something doesn’t mean it’s done correctly.
“About as predictive as job interviews for job success”
So really fucking bad?
r = 0.23
Lmao.
Is this a joke? This isn’t even close to a correlation. If anything this is evidence of a lack of correlation.
I’m politically affiliated with that rich nasa furry that makes six figures.
No it can’t.