I use Arch Linux, and some apps require me to use Windows. I have tried to get Wine working, but it’s just too much of a hassle. If the only goal of my virtualization setup is to run something like Adobe apps (I’m not doing any gaming on it), will Virtualbox or virt-manager be the quick and easy choice for me? I have tried using Virtualbox, but it didn’t work due to some dkms drivers I think. I also don’t want to use QEMU by itself, as I don’t like using terminal commands and much prefer using a GUI to do things.

    • XNX@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      iirc gnome boxes doesnt support gpu passthrough while virt-manager does, which would be convenient to have for adobe apps.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I used VMware or vbox for 10+ years, or HyperV in Windows.

    Lastly in Linux I needed a windows XP install for an old program, I tried QEMU and after booting the install iso, I just created a small script to launch my installed image with some parameters I needed for serial port, and that’s it.

    I like QEMU, and will try to use it for any VM now.

  • paradox2011@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Just another recommendation for QEMU + Virtmanager. I’ve been using that setup for some time now and its a smooth and responsive experience.

    I did have some issues getting USB redirection on EndeavourOS, the virtualization entry on the Arch wiki helped. Check out section 8, SPICE. I didn’t have the same problem in Manjaro, so it appears to be just a missing package/configuration issue with more minimalist Arch-based distros.

  • root@precious.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’ll probably start with virt-manager then move to proxmox. This is the way, it’s only a matter of how long before you realize it’s better.