Its because the best robot they could do in the 1980s was a guy in a gold suit or a wheelie bin.

Bombs are 100% defensive. Right Kier?

I wouldn’t say I’m rooting for Iran, but I’m not rooting for the US either. I’m just observing a massive case of FAFO.

Bought mine for £17k 6 years ago. Don’t buy off the forecourt.

I don’t see how that helps the validity of race as a concept.

No he doesn’t. The redundant 1,600 are only 10% of the workforce. 16,000 total.

Certainly things can be open to abuse, and different regulatory systems have different loop holes. However I have seen examples where it’s been a good thing.

Milquetoast

Pretty sure all AI chat bots will be under 16.

Which is why “Not for profit” organisations are such a good thing. They are harder to get going but because they are not investment vehicles in the same way you don’t have CEOs installed just to maximise share value. Decisions are focused on what the company needs to perform its mission.

Your question assumes race is a real thing and not just something made up by people.

Cultures and communities are real. There’s Native American culture, Indian culture, Swedish culture and English culture. There is no “white” culture. It’s the clash of cultures than normally causes the problems we see in the world that we mislabel as “race”.

No you’re not the only one.

The US has an obsession with race which is understandable but deeply unhealthy. It will never heal as a country until it can get over it’s obsession.

There are billions being sunk into AI. How much health care could that buy? Your logic only makes sense if AI is free. It’s not.

Retaining data can mean violating legal obligations. Hidden backups can be a lawyers playground.

Also, be aware there are now artificial milk replacements that still have the proteins found in milk. It allows food to be marked as vegan, but can still cause problems for people who need dairy free.

Recently discovered when a family member had an allergic reaction (followed by hospital visit) after having a vegan desert.

Not with general purpose LLMs. They start off ok, but become much more interested in continuing the text they’ve already translated, rather than looking back to what it is they’re meant to translate. So they drift off course as the translation gets longer.

How about they all cross the aisle to the greens then.

Once you start trying to do anything that involves employing people (e.g. running a small business) you start realising how far a million goes. 5 software engineers in an office with equipment for a year? In a European country or USA/Canada, you’ll need the best part of a million. It’s not just salaries. There’s also employment taxes and other costs to consider.

A billion and it’s now more like 750 engineers for 15 years.

That’s more like our Conservative party doing it (which they are), but Labour is meant to be a worker’s party.

Sounds like a delectable combination.