a plan to ban ships linked to the U.S., Israel and other “hostile countries” from transiting the Strait of Hormuz until Tehran is compensated for war damage
I can’t imagine how utterly humiliating this must be for President Pedophile’s administration and the nation of AIPAC.
Despite being predictable, it remains an incredible defeat.
And like you, dear reader, I still haven’t forgotten about the Trump-Epstein Files.
LMAO, even
Despite the billions the US taxpayers give Israel, AIPAC is really struggling.
Massachusetts rocks.
But I state the obvious.
Can’t quite see the article, but I wonder at who the shipowners are outraged.
I wonder also if Fortune magazine makes clear what the status of the strait was prior to Beelzebibi somehow persuading President Pedophile to launch a war against Iran - despite the warnings from analysts at the Pentagon.
Very good point, thank you.
Goodness, this was brilliantly stated and I salute you. I think many would want to follow in your lead. An orderly line of eager participants, each wishing to have their turn, might be required.
Morons getting primaried.
Sweet.
This is the correct response.
This is such a beautiful line - I shall need to borrow it from time to time. Thank you for sharing!
Concerning Zionist Fetterman, Collins, and Murkowski, the old expression was this:
Getting a hall pass.
The BBC responded to the trust Wednesday in a court filing opposing the request to pause the order, arguing it “is a transparent effort to evade this Court’s clear and direct order and to continue to avoid the discovery obligations that Plaintiff took on when he chose to file this lawsuit.”
Wouldn’t someone in the US with a passing familiarity of lawsuits and who has been in court innumerable times have an inkling about the discovery phase?
I recognize President Pedophile is incredibly stupid, in addition to being a horrible human being. But I’m struggling to see how he could have made this mistake. Additionally, he has lawyers. This is incredible.
Good on the BBC for fighting this.
It wasn’t a blowout if you forget to look at how much money AIPAC spent.
I believe this is a very valid concern. They need the workers in pursuit of growth.
Also, I think it’s no coincidence that women’s rights are being revoked.
Bring it.
I believe this implies his legal team is busy.
That is a good thing and they have our support.
Miller’s attorney, Aaron Minc, took responsibility in a statement to CNN for the image being included in the link.
“Unfortunately, I missed the last three pages of a 40+ page document with sensitive content,” Minc said in the statement. “It was completely unintentional and a mistake. The moment I discovered the issue on Monday morning, I corrected the file immediately.”
Minc said he made “multiple passes” through the documents to ensure that no potentially sensitive details, including the child’s name, were included in their public release. But the child’s name was included dozens of times in an earlier version of the public file seen by CNN, along with details about payments to medical providers and several images of their daughter.
Oopsies.
Somehow, I feel that Minc is just covering for Miller.
the Ohio congressman said one of his primary motivations for airing out his divorce and child custody disputes was to safeguard their young child.
Yes, to protect his own child, he thought it would be best to just air out all the dirty laundry of the divorce on Twitter, setup a publicly accessible folder with sensitive images of his child, and also dox her.
You know, I think I can understand why President Pedophile likes this guy.
“Yesterday, you enabled your client, Congressman Max Miller, to share and disseminate to the public an electronic Dropbox folder of materials,” Chandra wrote, as reported by New York Times congressional correspondent Annie Karni. “This was in conjunction with a video rant about our client, Emily Moreno, that Miller posted on X.”
The first version of the folder contained private images of Miller and Moreno’s daughter, with the child’s name left unredacted, the letter says.
To counter his ex-wife’s statements, this Republican made sensitive pictures of him and his young daughter accessible to the Internet. He also ranted about everything on Twitter.
“At least one of those images could be considered Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) because the daughter’s genitals appear to be visible,” the filing says.
There appear to have been many views on the post:
The post garnered over 204,000 views before images were removed from a second version of the folder, the letter says.
And then the attorney continues…
The filing asks whether the images were removed because someone “realized that it was ill-advised (and, in the case of the potential CSAM image, illegal) to share these images with the world.”
“How many people accessed and downloaded the intimate image, and each of the other images of the child, including one in which her chest is exposed?” the letter demands.
I can’t imagine how the abuser will respond - or how he ever thought that any of this was sound in the first place.
Not that his father-in-law, another Ohio Republican, isn’t a total piece of shit himself. But you already likely heard.
I think you’re right, friend:
https://sh.itjust.works/post/64560809
It looks like it happened again. Person of color, esteemed researcher, valid visa, gets detained.
This is crazy.
“On June 27, 2023, she entered the country on a visa that would allow her to remain in the country until June 13, 2024,” the statement read. “In violation of our nation’s laws, she overstayed her visa. She will remain in ICE custody pending removal proceedings.”
ABC News reported that it obtained documents showing Ameaka had a work authorization permit until 2029 and had a pending asylum case. Earlier this week, Ameaka’s colleagues said they were “extremely distressed” by the esteemed researcher’s ICE arrest.
This time, the school didn’t even need to respond - ABC was able to obtain the documentation that - in all likelihood - ICE conveniently dismissed due to… reasons.
Even earning a Teacher of the Year award, in addition to a valid work visa, fails to protect a person of color:
This is horrible.