deleted by creator

Japan was in cybersecurity hellscape for some time already.

Do they use git and github interchangably?

They sometimes work better if you abuse them enough or make a rule for them that says you are going to abuse them if they won’t behave.

Understood, lol. It was called powder or tetrapack around here. It wasn’t as bad as it looks, better than some bottled wine I’ve had in recent years. It might be nostalgia or teenager mind making it up tho. 🫠

Cheap wines can be very different too, alcohol in general isn’t tasty but you can feel the difference between good cheap wine and bad cheap wine, because some take shortcuts and subpar grapes and some don’t, local cheap wine is almost certainly will be of better quality than some overseas cheap wine.

Or, maybe, your feeling of smell and taste aren’t good.

Freshly ground coffee is better than instant coffee. Freshly ground pepper is better than pregrounded. Don’t know what “box wine” is, but there is a difference between badly made wine and alright wine.

You get 80% there by being a software engineer to start with, without proper discipline and experience in the field it won’t be 80/20.

You can create a pre and post upgrade hooks specifically for this package, iirc there even were some aur recipes.

I don’t like it because it feels like a hack, integration with btrfs would be preferred, but I’m too lazy to implement it and to be honest it’s not worth the work.

And local civilians still believe that m*scovites won’t kill them because they are old or there is a white strip on their cars. They didn’t learn in Toretsk, they didn’t learn in Kostyantynivka, they didn’t learn in Druzhkivka, they won’t learn it in Kramatorsk.

Prometheus + grafana. It’s overkill tbh, most of the services restart automatically and I mostly ignore it. (it’s an artifact from life where I cared about it)

By saving them beforehand, it’s a very old trick.

Reboot is a recommended choice on any linux system after kernel upgrade (systemd as well).

It’s not a simple package manager and it can do a lot, not on the level of zypper but it’s pretty complete. There are some intentional limitations, true.

Arch package manager isn’t really simplistic? Maintainers can mitigate this easily, just goes counter arch philosophy.

Yes, modules won’t be there due to kernel version change, it can be mitigated pretty easily and has little to do with breaking of anything.

That’s not a broken kernel problem. 😉

Quick search doesn’t show anything, I mean it should be one bullet, what’s the solution? Bind mounts?

You can use pacman hooks to backup and then restore modules pre and post kernel upgrade. I’ve used it for some time, it bothered me so I’ve started to think about how to make it better (use btrfs features) but in the end just returned to reboot after upgrade scheme.

Nix fixes kernel updates? How? I know how it can be done on arch, but it’s sort of hack.

With LLM it’s closer to 60/40, you can get an MVP in a day or two, but the next step is either impossible or so hard it will require so much resources that it makes it almost impossible. But if you start with a very clear idea of architecture and software stack - in that case you’ll get 80/20. Then the real problem starts - you don’t know your code, and have no idea how everything interacts and there going to be thousands or tens of thousands of lines of shit that does nothing or done something in the past that LLM forgot to remove, or it left a document that describes it so it won’t remove it and so on.