While that is true yes, their whole brand is built on being secure.
If they release to Fairphone it won’t be long before the news is flooded with “Police easily bypass supposedly secure GraphoneOS”
And that’s not a look they’d want.
I like their stance on All or Nothing.
Motorola is shipping with GraphineOS soon.
Especially considering that is with 12gb of RAM instead of the previous 8
Go have a look at the math, it technically helps but it’s so miniscule that it barely counts.
We’re digging shit tons of coal and oil out and burning it every year
Trees decay when they die, and just turn back into CO2
Oil came from a time before bacteria evolved to break down trees.
Trees won’t solve the issue, unless we start turning deserts into permanent forests, which would probably just create issues elsewhere
There isn’t really a thing as sustainable levels.
If we keep pumping CO2 into the air, thing will keep getting worse, just at a slower rate.
Even if we completely stopped CO2 today, it will still keep getting worse, as the CO2 we already added acts like a blanket, warming up the globe year by year
That would take at least 50+ years.
Millions would die, if we just stopped fossil fuels tomorrow
I think we should start here
Humans will continue to follow their nature. Shouting “You should have restraint” doesn’t solve anything.
It would be nice if we have restraint, but we don’t.
I’m all for stopping fossil fuels, and Degrowth, but realistically that isn’t happening in the next 50+ years.
This buys us time while we further our technology and solve the actual issue.
What do we know “Will work for sure” ?
To my knowledge that does not exist, as in my post, even if we became Net-Zero tomorrow, we’re still Fucked. Carbon capture isn’t viable.
Eventually we will all burn when the sun swallows the earth.
It’s not just us brining though, all the creatures are effected by global warming far worse than we are, if we need to implement desperate measures like this to save ourselves, and by extension others, so be it.
If you think this is a bad idea, please say why you think so, and what the alternatives are.
I think this idea has issues, but compared to “Just keep doing what we’re doing” it seems like a viable option.
At the very least, doing research into this seems like a no brainier.
I’ve been following this channel for a while.
The man does proper science and is a researcher.
What do y’all think about this? It seems like a actual viable way to deal with climate change
Yea I’m completely stepping away from all subscriptions.
The only subscriptions I will pay for is for things like Email etc.
As the person offering the service needs to keep their servers running etc.
Yea it’s not free but it’s a once off, keep for ever price.
I’m happy with that
It wasn’t just written by AI, it was badly written and quoting sources that don’t exist
Yea I’d like to see a graph of refineries hit in the last 12 months
As someone who develops apps for a life. and has ~15 years experience building software.
It does not fucking double the work, developing the app is 90% of the work.
Changing the name and releasing 10 of them doesn’t add a lot more work.
They don’t have to create two apps, it feels like you’re trying really hard to strawman the situation.
There are a few apps already that support both Lemmy and PieFed, saying create two apps, implies doubling the work. When it’s not that at all, it’s just adding compatibility where one differs from the other. Lemmy and PieFed are 90% the same thing, if not more.
This is news to me, how were they hostile?
I would think they’d be happy if others also implement security features