Correlation ≠ causation. I would assume that people with underlying health conditions sleep less/worse on average. Some of those health conditions could in some cases cause cancer and in others some could be cancer. Now let me actually read the article and see if they took account of this.

Edit: It has a bunch of caveats at the end quoting someone saying things like i did but with some actually expertise, e.g.

“So if your immune system takes a bit of a hit, then I suppose it would make sense that your risk of some cancers may increase. But it also might be the other way around. It could be that if you have cancer, and it’s not yet clinically obvious, it could be causing some change in how you sleep.”

So don’t stay up at night more worring that doing so is causing cancer. There’s every chance it isn’t and there are just a few unlucky people that are creating the association, because they have some form already.

This is 14 days old. Why post it now? I think most people interested will already know.

I think he just means no one likes him

I’m looking forward to the campaign slogan. “Chaos with Ed Miliband”

“The pen is mightier than the Claude”

I love that the first episode of Sam and Max starts with a “previously on”. 😆

If your Righteous Indignation has suffered a hit.
And your photon accelerator’s broken a bit.
And you’re losing your mind, and you’re having a fit.
Who’s the funky fresh rabbit who can take care of it!

However true this may feel, I’m much more worried that Reform will end up in power than I am excited that the Greens might.

Enceladus is right up there too

Have you looked at Nepal’s time zone? I just don’t think they realy care what other countries do.

It’s probably 100s of billions by now. Defiantly 10s of billions. Don’t just think of the trade losses. Consider the opportunity cost. All that effort trying to prepare for consequence of shooting ourselves in the foot. All the time dedicated to selecting and arguing over the bullet that dominated politics for a decade. And then think what could’ve been achieved in the same time. Also the productivity losses compound. A little less economic growth every year is a very big gap after a few years.

“The View? I’m gonna watch The View?”

“Hey Mikey. I think he likes it”

Good explanation. Maybe people should just vote for the party they think best represents their views then? How novel.

The poll suggests that tactical voting could easily swing the contest, with anti-Reform voters significantly more likely to switch to the Greens than to Labour.

Seems like this poll can tell you which is the best ‘stop Reform’ vote OP.

I think this type of argument is relatively flawed. Obviously I’m very happy to leave one platform for another, but most people dont like change and want to be where thier friends are. I think it’s reasonable to expect them to get over the former, but because of the former they would probably have to leave their friends behind. Thats obviously not viable for teenagers and it’s a rare few that are willing to do that into thier 20s as well.

Seeing as getting people to make a move is so hard I think forcing these platforms not to be so vile would be a good move. We should put the onus on the platforms, not the users.

The women that left after the first album has been back in the band for over a decade and I had no idea. That’s more time than she’d left for.

In 2012, Donaghy and her former colleagues Mutya Buena and Keisha Buchanan confirmed their reunion.

But they only got rights to the original band name in 2019

The original trio were not able to release music under the name Sugababes as it was still owned by the management company. They instead released music under the new name Mutya Keisha Siobhan, until they secured the legal rights to the Sugababes name again in 2019.

That’s what she said

So that’s what an undercroft is!

I wasn’t listed already!? Wild

But The Fades was sooooo much better, and they cancelled it to make more Being Human 😢