• 1 Post
  • 2.63K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 28th, 2023

help-circle

  • Relevant paragraph:

    PQC readiness “is mostly actuarial/risk management—even if the chance of building a CRQC by, say, 2030 is very low (say 5 percent), the downside risk is huge,” he explained. “Combine that with very long transition engineering times, and you should have started already.”

    Also, relevant paragraph from the wiki page for integer factorization records:

    The largest number reliably factored by Shor’s algorithm, rather than some other quantum method, is 21 which was factored in 2012.[26][27] The number 15 had previously been factored by several labs and subsequent attempts to factorise 35 failed.[27

    And a relevant excerpt from this study looking at “factored” primes above 21

    Large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computers capable of implementing Shor’s algorithm are not yet available, preventing relevant benchmarking experiments. Recently, several authors have attempted quantum factorizations via reductions to SAT or similar NP-hard problems. While this approach may shed light on algorithmic approaches for quantum solutions to NP-hard problems, in this paper we study and question its practicality. We find no evidence that this is a viable path toward factoring large numbers, even for scalable fault-tolerant quantum computers, as well as for various quantum annealing or other special purpose quantum hardware.

    I’ll be concerned when we start seeing primes being factored when they’re not using compiled Shor algorithm primes. So far, most of the big “factorization records” cheat and use primes with only the LSBs differing, and aren’t remotely close to anything used in a real RSA prime. There was a good discussion of it on Security Now episode 1034 for those who are interested.



  • regardless of if the comics were fine, later in life he was a jackass so who cares?

    I see a big difference between an artist that posts derogatory art and artists who are shitheads in real life. There’s an argument to be made about separating the art from the artist when the overall corpus of the art is not offensive that doesn’t exist for offensive art.

    I’m all for banning offensive art, but you’re advocating for purity tests for the artists, which is too far imo



  • There’s nothing to be gained by forcing people to act in ways that they do not wish to act, or to think in ways that they do not wish to think.

    In context of the conversation, you’re saying there’s nothing to be gained by banning comics from racist artists.

    The way you’re using that quote is basically saying, “Agree with me, and think the way I tell you to think, or you’re a bad person”.

    You sure? Because in response to your statement saying you don’t have an opinion (ie, you’re doing nothing), it means that you’re allowing bad to happen due to apathy (that’s assuming you see yourself as a good person, if you’re not, disregard).

    That is evil, and people of good conscience should not agree with you.

    One of these days I’m going to create /c/selfawarewolves…

    Twist yourself up like a pretzel all you want, but at least listen to what you’re saying and think about it for more than 5 seconds. Because you’re supporting people who spread bigotry by arguing against banning them, and trying to take the moral high ground.












  • The art isn’t the problem

    Yeah, it’s not like you have anything like

    • Two Indian characters named after the region they’re supposed to be from
    • Stereotypically named Irish character obsessed with blowing stuff up and making alcohol
    • An Asian character named “cho chang”
    • Bankers that are barely disguised anti-Semitic tropes
    • Literally a tweet saying only “Anthony Goldstein, Ravenclaw, Jewish wizard.” in response to accusations of no Jewish wizards
    • Naming the black adult “Shacklebolt”