After checking, you can’t really make any conclusions with a sample size this small
It tested 19 cisgender men and 12 trans men, along with 23 trans women and 21 cisgender women
It could give an indicator but clearly not a definitive answer. This has little to no proof value, but hey, in this field, we’re pretty limited with sample size, so we’ll have to do with it.
The reality seems to be that both sides lack scientific and statistical data to back 'em up. The only thing we know rn is that hormonotherapy should be required.
This is no longer a science matter. Unfortunately, it’s become a political matter
Totally agree with this however. This discussion and my recents bans are proof of this.
❤️ feels good to hear from time to time. I’m just shocked at how much people are fine with that.
It’s pretty similar to hexbear and lemmygrad in a way. You learn to avoid and not trigger them because it always end in a bloodbath even though you never intended it to
I believe what infuriates me the most is that your comments just end up being deleted instead of just downvoted. It always goes in the same way, as if there’s only one voice.
Things doesn’t always go your way and people should accept that.
If it hurts them to discuss these kind of topics, then don’t, but don’t go and call people transphobic for that because it’s just not. Maybe they should just not get hurt or offended that easily.
If you get hurt because someone doesn’t have the same opinion as you while still being respectful, that’s sad.
That’s just the argument from authority all over again. Transphobia is transphobia. Not agreeing on a particuliar subject is not transphobia because a random transgender person said so, or even if all of them say so. A definition is a definition, you don’t get to redefine the meaning of words to fit your narrative.
Sure. So questionning about sports and potentially being wrong makes me transphobic?
That’s exactly my point. If you don’t know, you’re transphobic. If we don’t agree with you, we’re transphobic. If you’re wrong because you made a mistake, then it’s deliberate and you’re transphobic.
I know your kind very well. I used to be one.
The good old argument from authority, I see. We’re not the same, and you don’t know me better than myself. Thanks. Please refrain from using manipulatory speech tactics.
Btw to be transparent, I still haven’t done the research about the sport subject after the criticism. It’s about time I do. If I’m wrong, then I’m wrong, and I’ll admit it, but giving facts is better than saying I’m motivated by some evil intentions, because that’s just base-less and wrong, and another manipulation technique.
as you’re refusing to do the bare minimum required to speak to that person as an equal
That’s what’s you think is going on, but that’s not the case. You jump to conclusions and say that everyone not agreeing with you is a bigot, or should act like they know nothing and trust you because you’re the incontested authority. It doesn’t work that way.
“Right to exist” is a very manipulative way of qualifying trans debates. Most of them go way beyond that, like the questions of athletes, or whether it makes more sense or not to restrict by sex or by gender, and the distinction between the 2.
I view you as the tankies of gender, really. Not all of you sure, but there sure are a lot
Seriously, I have enough of people using this kind of reasoning for censoring everything and having strong moderation. I’m pretty sure nearly no one does that
After checking, you can’t really make any conclusions with a sample size this small
It could give an indicator but clearly not a definitive answer. This has little to no proof value, but hey, in this field, we’re pretty limited with sample size, so we’ll have to do with it.
The reality seems to be that both sides lack scientific and statistical data to back 'em up. The only thing we know rn is that hormonotherapy should be required.
Totally agree with this however. This discussion and my recents bans are proof of this.